Cited by 52Agricultural and Food SciencesThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Physical and chemical evaluation of furniture waste briquettes

Moreno, Ana Isabel, Font, Rafael, Conesa, Juan A.·2016·Waste Management

Abstract

Furniture waste is mainly composed of wood and upholstery foam (mostly polyurethane foam). Both of these have a high calorific value, therefore, energy recovery would be an appropriate process to manage these wastes. Nevertheless, the drawback is that the energy content of these wastes is limited due to their low density mainly that of upholstery foam. Densification of separate foam presents difficulties due to its elastic character. The significance of this work lies in obtaining densified material by co-densification of furniture wood waste and polyurethane foam waste. Densification of furniture wood and the co-densification of furniture wood waste with polyurethane foam have been studied. On the one hand, the parameters that have an effect on the quality of the furniture waste briquettes have been analysed, i.e., moisture content, compaction pressure, presence of lignin, etc. The maximum weight percentage of polyurethane foam that can be added with furniture wood waste to obtain durable briquettes and the optimal moisture were determined. On the other hand, some parameters were analysed in order to evaluate the possible effect on the combustion. The chemical composition of waste wood was compared with untreated wood biomass; the higher nitrogen content and the concentration of some metals were the most important differences, with a significant difference of Ti content.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.048

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreno, A. I., Font, R., & Conesa, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Alicante (ES)
Corresponding author
Moreno, Ana Isabel
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
49
Pages
245-252
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2263206465
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
15.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
  • RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competividad
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
furniture waste, wood waste, polyurethane foam, briquettes, densification, energy recovery, moisture content, compaction pressure, lignin, combustion characteristics, chemical composition, nitrogen content, metal content, titanium
MeSH terms
Interior Design and Furnishings, Lignin, Polyurethanes, Wood, Incineration, Waste Management, Solid Waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review