Cited by 17Composting and Vermicomposting TechniquesPlant Disease Management TechniquesLandfill Environmental Impact Studies

Hygienization and control of Diplodia seriata fungus in vine pruning waste composting and its seasonal variability in open and closed systems

Open access
Matei, Petruta M., Sánchez-Báscones, Mercedes, Bravo-Sánchez, Carmen T., Martín-Ramos, Pablo, Martín-Villullas, M. Teresa, García-González, M. Cruz, Hernández-Navarro, Salvador, Navas-Gracia, Luis M. +1 more·2016·Waste Management

Abstract

After the ban on sodium arsenite, waste management alternatives to the prevalent burning method, such as the hygienization and biodegradation in solid phase by composting, are required for the pruned material from grapevines affected by various fungi. In this work the dynamics of a fungus associated with vine decay (Diplodia seriata) during the composting process of a mixture of laying hen manure and vine pruning waste (2:1w/w) have been investigated in an open pile and a discontinuous closed biodigester. Through the optimization of the various physical-chemical parameters, hygienization of the infected waste materials was attained, yielding class-A organo-mineral fertilizers. Nevertheless, important differences in the efficiency of each system were observed: whereas in the open pile it took 10days to control D. seriata and 35 additional composting days to achieve full inactivation, in the discontinuous biodigester the fungus was entirely inactivated within the first 3-7days. Finally, the impact of seasonal variability was assessed and summer temperatures shown to have greater significance in the open pile.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.08.002

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. EPA, 2002. Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices. National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA.
  2. Grüneklee, C.E., 1998. Comparing open versus in-vessel composting. In: Proceedings of Asian-North American Conference on Solid Waste Management. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, International Solid Waste Association, Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp. 68-79.
  3. Matei, P.M., Sánchez Báscones, M., Martín-Villullas, M.T., Diez-Gutiérrez, M.A., García-González, M.C., 2014. Eficiencia del compostaje de sarmientos de vid mediante pilas abiertas como metodode higienización. In: IV Jornadas de la Red Española de Compostaje. De Residuo a Recurso: Estrategias de gestión tratamiento y valorización en el Horizonte 2020, 12-14 November 2014, Murcia, Spain. Red Española de Compostaje. pp. 156- 160.
  4. Phillips, A.J.L., 2007. Key to the various lineages in ''Botryosphaeria" Version 01 2007. v. 01 ed, vol. 2016, Centro de Recursos Microbiológicos, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Caparica, Lisbon, Portugal.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matei, P. M., Sánchez-Báscones, M., Bravo-Sánchez, C. T., Martín-Ramos, P., Martín-Villullas, M. T., García-González, M. C., Hernández-Navarro, S., Navas-Gracia, L. M., & Martín-Gil, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
  • Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León (ES)
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
58
Pages
126-134
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2485327118
Cited by
17
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zaguan (Universidad de Zaragoza) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UVaDOC UVaDOC University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Junta de Castilla y León’s
  • Santander Universidades
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
Keywords
Diplodia seriata, composting, fungal inactivation, laying hen manure, organomineral fertilizer, seasonal variation, temperature effects
MeSH terms
Animals, Ascomycota, Chickens, Electric Conductivity, Female, Fertilizers, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Manure, Seasons, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Temperature, Waste Management, Plant Shoots, Germination, Metals, Heavy, Vitis, Lepidium sativum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review