The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building
Abstract
The study investigates the potential environmental impacts related to the end-of-life phase of a residential building, identified in a multifamily dwelling of three levels, constructed in the South of Italy by utilizing conventional materials and up-to-date procedures. An attributional life cycle assessment has been utilised to quantify the contributions of each stage of the end-of-life phase, with a particular attention to the management of the demolition waste. The investigation takes into account the selective demolition, preliminary sorting and collection of main components of the building, together with the processes of sorting, recycling and/or disposal of main fractions of the demolition waste. It quantifies the connections between these on-site and off-site processes as well as the main streams of materials sent to recycling, energy recovery, and final disposal. A sensitivity analysis has been eventually carried out by comparing the overall environmental performances of some alternative scenarios, characterised by different criteria for the demolition of the reference building, management of demolition waste and assessment of avoided burdens of the main recycled materials. The results quantify the advantage of an appropriate technique of selective demolition, which could increase the quality and quantity of residues sent to the treatment of resource recovery and safe disposal. They also highlight the contributions to the positive or negative environmental impact of each stage of the investigated waste management system. The recycling of reinforcing steel appears to play a paramount role, accounting for 65% of the total avoided impacts related to respiratory inorganics, 89% of those for global warming and 73% of those for mineral extraction.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The recycling of metals has higher environmental benefit when measured in terms of GHG emissions avoided than the recycling of other materials [97].”
From Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—a review (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Citations
Cites
Recent developments in life cycle assessment
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,444
IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology
Jolliet, O., Margni, M. D., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., & Rosenbaum, R. K. (2003) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02978505 · Cited by 1,968
Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037 · Cited by 1,634
Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA
Ortiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2008) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012 · Cited by 1,344
Zabalza, I., Capilla, A. V., & Aranda‐Usón, A. (2010) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002 · Cited by 1,306
Zabalza, I., Aranda‐Usón, A., & Scarpellini, S. (2009) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.001 · Cited by 697
Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy
Blengini, G. A. (2008) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.03.007 · Cited by 490
Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems
Clavreul, J., Guyonnet, D., & Christensen, T. H. (2012) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.008 · Cited by 377
Asdrubali, F., Baldassarri, C., & Fthenakis, V. M. (2013) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018 · Cited by 352
Perugini, F., Mastellone, M. L., & Arena, U. (2005) · Environmental Progress · doi:10.1002/ep.10078 · Cited by 349
Self-citationBlengini, G. A., & Garbarino, E. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.027 · Cited by 306
The Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Integrated Solid Waste Management
Clift, R., Doig, A. G., & Finnveden, G. (2000) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1205/095758200530790 · Cited by 285
Influence of construction and demolition waste management on the environmental impact of buildings
Coelho, A., & de Brito, J. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.011 · Cited by 283
Construction and demolition waste management – a holistic evaluation of environmental performance
Dahlbo, H., Bachér, J., Lähtinen, K., Jouttijärvi, T., Suoheimo, P., Mattila, T., Sironen, S., Myllymaa, T., & Saramäki, K. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.073 · Cited by 273
Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: Life cycle assessment of houses
Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., & Azapagic, A. (2012) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.005 · Cited by 272
Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management
Butera, S., Christensen, T. H., & Astrup, T. F. (2015) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.07.011 · Cited by 240
Rodrigues, F., Carvalho, M. T., Evangelista, L., & de Brito, J. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.023 · Cited by 230
Giugliano, M., Cernuschi, S., Grosso, M., & Rigamonti, L. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.02.029 · Cited by 135
A web-based Decision Support System for the optimal management of construction and demolition waste
Banias, G., Achillas, C., Vlachokostas, C., MOUSSIOPOULOS, N., & Papaioannou, I. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.018 · Cited by 130
Rigamonti, L., Grosso, M., & Sunseri, M. C. (2009) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-009-0095-3 · Cited by 127
Environmental consequences of recycling aluminum old scrap in a global market
Sevigné‐Itoiz, E., Gasol, C. M., Rieradevall, J., & Gabarrell, X. (2014) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.05.002 · Cited by 126
Life cycle assessment of sub-units composing a MSW management system
Rigamonti, L., Grosso, M., & Giugliano, M. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.029 · Cited by 125
Arena, U., Ardolino, F., & Gregorio, F. D. (2015) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.041 · Cited by 121
Self-citationBala, A., Raugei, M., & Fullana–i–Palmer, P. (2015) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0861-3 · Cited by 89
Management of construction and demolition waste
Poon, C. S. (2006) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2006.10.012 · Cited by 82
Nasrullah, M., Vainikka, P., Hannula, J., et al. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.06.009 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Grimaud, H., 2016. Improving management of construction and demolition waste. Workshop “Improving Management of Construction and Demolition Waste”, Brussels, May 25th, 2016. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/mixed_waste.htm#workshop.
- ICSG-International Copper Study Group, 2015. The World Copper Factbook 2015, pp. 57. Available at http://www.icsg.org/index.php/component/jdownloads/finish/170-publications-press-releases/2092-2015-10-03-icsg-factbook-2015?Itemid=0.
- Wiaux, F., 2016. A global overview of the data collection practices in the EU and ways to improve the reporting. Workshop “Improving management of construction and demolition waste”, Brussels, May 25th, 2016. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/mixed_waste.htm#workshop.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hertwich, E. G., Ali, S., Ciacci, L., Fishman, T., Heeren, N., Masanet, E., Asghari, F. N., Olivetti, E., Pauliuk, S., Tu, Q., et al. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab0fe3 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Vitale, P., Arena, N., Di Gregorio, F., & Arena, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Arena, Umberto
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 311-321
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2531716239
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 16.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Waste Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Keywords
- end-of-life phase, residential buildings, demolition waste, selective demolition, recycling, energy recovery, waste disposal, multi-family housing, resource recovery
- MeSH terms
- Construction Materials, Housing, Italy, Refuse Disposal, Waste Management, Recycling, Solid Waste
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review