The decay of engineered wood products and paper excavated from landfills in Australia
Open accessAbstract
Large volumes of engineered wood products (EWPs) and paper are routinely placed in landfills in Australia, where they are assumed to decay. However, the extent of decay for EWPs is not well-known. This study reports carbon loss from EWPs and paper buried in landfills in Sydney, Brisbane and Cairns in Australia, located in temperate, subtropical and tropical climates, respectively. The influence of pulp type (mechanical and chemical) and landfill type (municipal solid waste - MSW and construction and demolition - C&D) on decay levels were investigated. Carbon loss for EWPs ranged from 0.6 to 9.0%; though there is some uncertainty in these values due to limitations associated with sourcing appropriate controls. Carbon loss for paper products ranged from 0 to 58.9%. Papers produced from predominantly mechanical pulps generally had lower levels of decay than those produced via chemical or partly chemical processes. Typically, decay levels for paper products were highest for the tropical Cairns landfill, suggesting that climate may be a significant factor to be considered when estimating emissions from paper in landfills. For EWPs, regardless of the landfill type and climate, carbon losses were low, confirming results from previous laboratory studies. Lower carbon losses were observed for EWP and paper excavated from the Sydney C&D landfill, compared with the Sydney MSW landfill, confirming the hypothesis that conditions in C&D landfills are less favourable for decay. These result…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even engineered wood product (EWP) contributes a large amount of waste to the CDWW stream.
“Even engineered wood product (EWP) contributes a large amount of waste to the CDWW stream [27].”
From Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Contamination is the main hindrance to sending wood waste to landfilling.
“Thus, contamination is the main hindrance to sending wood waste to landfilling [27,101].”
From Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
EWP contains chromium, copper, arsenic, LOSP, lead, and boron, which are hazardous to the environment and particularly challenging to remove during recycling.
“EWP contains chromium, copper, arsenic, LOSP, lead, and boron, which are hazardous to the environment and particularly challenging to remove during recycling [27,92].”
From Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Wood: Chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions
(1983) · doi:10.1515/9783110839654 · Cited by 2,846 · see citing works
The decay of wood in landfills in contrasting climates in Australia
Ximenes, F., Björdal, C., Cowie, A., & Barlaz, M. (2015) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.032 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach
Jahan, I., Zhang, G., Bhuiyan, M., & Navaratnam, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710478 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Construction Timber Waste Management as a Circular Economy Resource:
Nyang’au, S. N., Mbuge, D. O., Amedi, D. M., Mati, B., & Vodohi, C. (2024) · AFRICA HABITAT REVIEW · doi:10.66563/77bgnb41
- Authors
- Ximenes, F. A., Cowie, A. L., & Barlaz, M. A.
- Affiliations
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ximenes, Fabiano A.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 312-322
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2775378935
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 339 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Waste Management (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
- Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting
- Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australian Government
- Forest and Wood Products Australia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Keywords
- engineered wood products, carbon loss, mechanical pulp, chemical pulp, municipal solid waste landfill, construction and demolition waste, climate effects on decomposition, greenhouse gas emissions, greenhouse gas inventory, Australia
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Carbon, Methane, Refuse Disposal, Wood, Solid Waste, Waste Disposal Facilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review