Cited by 144Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Building Design and AssessmentRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

Factors driving the implementation of reverse logistics: A quantified model for the construction industry

Open access
Chileshe, Nicholas, Rameezdeen, Raufdeen, Hosseini, M. Reza, Martek, Igor, Li, Hong Xian, Panjehbashi-Aghdam, Parinaz·2018·Waste Management

Abstract

In the light of increased environmental concerns and the unsustainability of current construction practices, 'reverse logistics' (RL) has emerged as a remedial strategy, whereby decommissioned buildings are salvaged and returned back through the value chain for recovery, refurbishment and reuse. The drivers that impact the uptake of RL are known, but if sustainability outcomes are to be enhanced, the strength of those drivers must be quantified in order to ascertain where efforts should be focused. This study aims to quantify the effects of known drivers on RL, and in so doing identify action items with the greatest potential to positively improve RL outcomes. RL drivers are culled from extant research, and categorized as economic, environmental, or social forces. A conceptual model is developed and tested against questionnaire results drawn from 49 expert respondents active in the South Australian construction industry. The results are analyzed using structured equation modeling. Economic and environmental drivers, such as the continuing relative high cost of salvaged items, along with expediency of cost, time and quality objectives overshadowing regulatory demands for use of such salvaged items, are shown to predict 34% of the variations in implementing RL. Of particular interest is the finding contradicting previous studies, showing that social drivers, such as perceived benefits from 'going green' had no significant impact. Thus, the road-map to improving RL outcomes lies…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lower price of reused components can contribute to cost savings in construction projects.

    “For example, according to Chileshe et al., (2018), da Rocha and Sattler (2009), Dunant et al. (2017), Gorgolewski et al. (2008), Klang et al. (2003) and MacKinnon (2000), the lower price of the reused components can contribute to the cost savings in the construction projects.”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., (2018)

  • An attractive price for reused components supports the growth of a reuse market in the long run.

    “which in the long run supports the growth of a reuse market (Chileshe et al., 2018; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Tingley et al., 2017)”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2018

  • Environmental policies and green building rating systems such as BREEAM and LEED have a positive impact on reuse rates.

    “The environmental policies (Chileshe et al., 2018) and green building rating systems such as Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) are reported to have a positive impact on reuse rates (Shaurette, 2006; Gorgolewski, 2008).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2018

  • Availability of regulatory and financial incentives to encourage deconstruction and reuse, and existence of regulations supporting these interventions, can potentially promote reuse.

    “The availability of regulatory and financial incentives to encourage deconstruction and reuse, as well as the existence of regulations supporting these interventions, can potentially promote reuse (Chileshe et al., 2018).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review

    Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x20910463 · Cited by 167 · see citing works

    “The environmental policies (Chileshe et al., 2018) and green building rating systems such as Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) are reported to have a positive impact on reuse rates (Shaurette, 2006;…”
    BackgroundInfluential

Authors
Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Li, H. X., & Panjehbashi-Aghdam, P.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hosseini, M. Reza
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
79
Pages
48-57
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883777905
Cited by
144
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9
FWCI
20.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deakin University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Keywords
reverse logistics, construction industry, economic factors, environmental drivers, social drivers, environmental policy, regulatory compliance, sustainable construction, South Australia
MeSH terms
Australia, Costs and Cost Analysis, Models, Theoretical, Environmental Policy, Construction Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review