Factors driving the implementation of reverse logistics: A quantified model for the construction industry
Open accessAbstract
In the light of increased environmental concerns and the unsustainability of current construction practices, 'reverse logistics' (RL) has emerged as a remedial strategy, whereby decommissioned buildings are salvaged and returned back through the value chain for recovery, refurbishment and reuse. The drivers that impact the uptake of RL are known, but if sustainability outcomes are to be enhanced, the strength of those drivers must be quantified in order to ascertain where efforts should be focused. This study aims to quantify the effects of known drivers on RL, and in so doing identify action items with the greatest potential to positively improve RL outcomes. RL drivers are culled from extant research, and categorized as economic, environmental, or social forces. A conceptual model is developed and tested against questionnaire results drawn from 49 expert respondents active in the South Australian construction industry. The results are analyzed using structured equation modeling. Economic and environmental drivers, such as the continuing relative high cost of salvaged items, along with expediency of cost, time and quality objectives overshadowing regulatory demands for use of such salvaged items, are shown to predict 34% of the variations in implementing RL. Of particular interest is the finding contradicting previous studies, showing that social drivers, such as perceived benefits from 'going green' had no significant impact. Thus, the road-map to improving RL outcomes lies…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lower price of reused components can contribute to cost savings in construction projects.
“For example, according to Chileshe et al., (2018), da Rocha and Sattler (2009), Dunant et al. (2017), Gorgolewski et al. (2008), Klang et al. (2003) and MacKinnon (2000), the lower price of the reused components can contribute to the cost savings in the construction projects.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., (2018)
An attractive price for reused components supports the growth of a reuse market in the long run.
“which in the long run supports the growth of a reuse market (Chileshe et al., 2018; da Rocha and Sattler, 2009; Tingley et al., 2017)”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2018
Environmental policies and green building rating systems such as BREEAM and LEED have a positive impact on reuse rates.
“The environmental policies (Chileshe et al., 2018) and green building rating systems such as Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) are reported to have a positive impact on reuse rates (Shaurette, 2006; Gorgolewski, 2008).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2018
Availability of regulatory and financial incentives to encourage deconstruction and reuse, and existence of regulations supporting these interventions, can potentially promote reuse.
“The availability of regulatory and financial incentives to encourage deconstruction and reuse, as well as the existence of regulations supporting these interventions, can potentially promote reuse (Chileshe et al., 2018).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Chileshe et al., 2018
Cites
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536 · see citing works
Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective
Densley Tingley, D., Cooper, S., & Cullen, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.006 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
da Rocha, C. G., & Sattler, M. A. (2009) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.004 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review
Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x20910463 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
“The environmental policies (Chileshe et al., 2018) and green building rating systems such as Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) are reported to have a positive impact on reuse rates (Shaurette, 2006;…”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Li, H. X., & Panjehbashi-Aghdam, P.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hosseini, M. Reza
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 48-57
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883777905
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 20.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Waste Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deakin University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Keywords
- reverse logistics, construction industry, economic factors, environmental drivers, social drivers, environmental policy, regulatory compliance, sustainable construction, South Australia
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Costs and Cost Analysis, Models, Theoretical, Environmental Policy, Construction Industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review