CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sorting out a problem: A co-production approach to household waste management in Shanghai, China

Lu, Hongmei, Sidortsov, Roman·2019·Waste Management
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Ahmed, 2006, People as partners: facilitating people's participation in public–private partnerships for solid waste management, Habitat Int., 30, 781, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.09.004 · DOI
  2. Alford, 1998, A public management road less travelled: clients as co-producers of public services, Aust. J. Public Admin., 57, 128, 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01568.x · DOI
  3. Chen, 2014, Shanghai Formulates the policy to facilitate household waste sorting and reduction, Policy Outlook, 7, 55
  4. Guerrero, 2013, Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries, Waste Manage., 33, 220, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Gutberlet, 2015, More inclusive and cleaner cities with waste management co-production: Insights from participatory epistemologies and methods, Habitat Int., 46, 234, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.004 · DOI
  6. Hearn, 2005, The use of electrostatic techniques for the identification and sorting of waste packaging materials, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 44, 91, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.08.001 · DOI
  7. Howlett, 2017, Understanding co-production as a policy tool: integrating new public governance and comparative policy theory, J. Compar. Policy Anal.: Res. Pract., 1
  8. Hustinx, 2010, Social and cultural origins of motivations to volunteer: a comparison of university students in six countries, Int. Sociol., 25, 349, 10.1177/0268580909360297 · DOI
  9. Klijn, 2010, Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes, Admin. Soc., 42, 193, 10.1177/0095399710362716 · DOI
  10. Mizrahi, 2012, Self-provision of public services: its evolution and impact, Public Admin. Rev., 72, 285, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02505.x · DOI
  11. Onishi, 2005, How do the Japanese dump trash? let us count the myriad ways, New York Times, 12, 2
  12. Pestoff, 2010, Public governance and the third sector: opportunities for coproduction and innovation, New Public Gover., 223
  13. Peters, 2010, Meta-governance and public management, New Public Gover., 36
  14. Shanghai Statistics Bureau. (1978-2017). Shanghai Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
  15. Sørensen, 2012, Governance and innovation in the public sector, Oxford Handbook Gover., 215
  16. Tai, 2011, Municipal solid waste source-separated collection in China: a comparative analysis, Waste Manage., 31, 1673, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.014 · DOI
  17. Trevaskes, 2010, The shifting sands of punishment in China in the era of “Harmonious Society”, Law Policy, 32, 332, 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00323.x · DOI
  18. Wang, 2014, How is your view on “Fine on the refusal of waste sorting”, Youth Literator, 11, 4
  19. White, 2013, The role of governments in renewable energy: the importance of policy consistency, Biomass Bioenergy, 57, 97, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.035 · DOI
  20. Wu, 2016, Effects and improvement suggestions of green account system for waste classification and reduction in Shanghai, J. Shanghai Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 22, 197
  21. Xu, 2016, Perceived key elements of a successful residential food waste sorting program in urban apartments: stakeholder views, J. Cleaner Prod., 134, 362, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.107 · DOI
  22. Zhu, 2014, Faceoff five times, yet the crux remains——the dilemma of Shanghai waste sorting, Chinese Construct., 7, 14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
Lu, H., & Sidortsov, R.
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
95
Pages
271-277
ISSN
0956-053X
DOI
10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.020
Cited by
105
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sorting out a problem: A co-production approach to household waste management in Shanghai, China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.020
The paper
Lu, H., & Sidortsov, R. (2019). Sorting out a problem: A co-production approach to household waste management in Shanghai, China. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.020