The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digitalisation and intelligent robotics in value chain of circular economy oriented waste management – A review
Abstract
The general aim of circular economy is the most efficient and comprehensive use of resources. In order to achieve this goal, new approaches of Industry 4.0 are being developed and implemented in the field of waste management. The innovative K-project: Recycling and Recovery of Waste 4.0 - "ReWaste4.0" deals with topics such as digitalisation and the use of robotic technologies in waste management. Here, a summary of the already published results in these areas, which were divided into the four focused topics, is given: Collection and Logistics, Machines and waste treatment plants, Business models and Data Tools. Presented are systems and methods already used in waste management, as well as technologies that have already been successfully applied in other industrial sectors and will also be relevant in the waste management sector for the future. The focus is set on systems that could be used in waste treatment plants or machines in the future in order to make treatment of waste more efficient. In particular, systems which carry out the sorting of (mixed) waste via robotic technologies are of interest. Furthermore "smart bins" with sensors for material detection or level measurement, methods for digital image analysis and new business models have already been developed. The technologies are often based on large amounts of data that can contribute to increase the efficiency within plants. In addition, the results of an online market survey of companies from the waste management industry on the subject of waste management 4.0 or "digital readiness" are summarized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review on automated sorting of source-separated municipal solid waste for recycling
Gundupalli, S. P., Hait, S., & Thakur, A. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.015 · Cited by 583
The future of waste management in smart and sustainable cities: A review and concept paper
Esmaeilian, B., Wang, B., Lewis, K., Duarte, F., Ratti, C., & Behdad, S. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.047 · Cited by 495
A BIM-based system for demolition and renovation waste estimation and planning
Cheng, J. C. P., & Ma, L. Y. H. (2013) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.001 · Cited by 402
Hannan, M. A., Abdulla Al Mamun, M., Hussain, A., Basri, H., & Begum, R. A. (2015) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.033 · Cited by 236
Wen, Z., Hu, S., De Clercq, D., Beck, M. B., Zhang, H., Zhang, H., Fei, F., & Liu, J. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.054 · Cited by 196
Gu, F., Ma, B., Guo, J., Summers, P. A., & Hall, P. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.037 · Cited by 173
Rossi, F., Zhang, R., Hindy, Y., & Pavone, M. (2018) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-018-9750-5 · Cited by 153
Rovetta, A., Fan, X., Vicentini, F., Zhu, M., Giusti, A., & He, Q. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.08.016 · Cited by 116
Shah, P. J., Anagnostopoulos, T., Zaslavsky, A., & Behdad, S. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.019 · Cited by 103
Inventory routing for dynamic waste collection
Mes, M., Schutten, J. M. J., & Rivera, A. E. P. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.011 · Cited by 86
Cited by
Industry 4.0 and the Circular Economy: A Literature Review and Recommendations for Future Research
Awan, U., Sroufe, R., & Shahbaz, M. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2731 · Cited by 609
A framework of digital technologies for the circular economy: digital functions and mechanisms
Liu, Q., Trevisan, A. H., Yang, M., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3015 · Cited by 324
Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers of smart cities’ waste management: An Indian context
Sharma, M., Joshi, S., Kannan, D., Govindan, K., Singh, R., & Purohit, H. C. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122047 · Cited by 284
Kurniawan, T. A., Dzarfan Othman, M. H., Hwang, G. H., & Gikas, P. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131911 · Cited by 282
Koskinopoulou, M., Raptopoulos, F., Papadopoulos, G., Mavrakis, N., & Maniadakis, M. (2021) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2021.3066040 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarc, R., Curtis, A., Kandlbauer, L., Khodier, K., Lorber, K. E., & Pomberger, R.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 476-492
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2954430690
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 30.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digitalisation and intelligent robotics in value chain of circular economy oriented waste management – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.035
- The paper
- Sarc, R., Curtis, A., Kandlbauer, L., Khodier, K., Lorber, K. E., & Pomberger, R. (2019). Digitalisation and intelligent robotics in value chain of circular economy oriented waste management – A review. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
