The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of penicillin G and its degradation products in a penicillin production wastewater treatment plant and the receiving river
Open accessAbstract
To investigate the fate of penicillin G (PEN G) in the wastewater from a PEN G production facility and the receiving river, an analytical method was developed for the simultaneous detection of PEN G and five degradation products using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI/MS). PEN G had already undergone transformation before entering into the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), with concentrations of 153+/-4 microg/L in raw wastewater. Most of the PEN G could be eliminated following successive treatments of anaerobic, hydrolysis, and two aerobic units under a hydraulic residence time (HRT) of 30 h, and the final concentrations were 1.68+/-0.48 microg/L in treated water. In the receiving river, the concentration of PEN G decreased from 0.31+/-0.04 microg/L at the discharging point to under the detection limit (0.03 microg/L) at the last sampling site (about 30 km from the discharging point). The main PEN G degradation products in surface water were found to be penilloic acid, penicilloic acid and isopenillic acid, which occupied 65.8%, 20.4% and 12.9%, respectively, of the total concentration at the last site. This is the first study on the behaviors of PEN G and its main degradation products in wastewater treatment processes and the aquatic environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Occurrence of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K., & Kratz, K.-L. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00337-4 · Cited by 2,140
Cited by
Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes
Le-Minh, N., Khan, S. J., Drewes, J. E., & Stuetz, R. M. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.020 · Cited by 778
Chen, H., Jing, L., Teng, Y., & Wang, J. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.054 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, D., Yang, M., Hu, J., Zhang, Y., Chang, H., & Jin, F.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 307-317
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992465892
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of penicillin G and its degradation products in a penicillin production wastewater treatment plant and the receiving river. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.016
- The paper
- Li, D., Yang, M., Hu, J., Zhang, Y., Chang, H., & Jin, F. (2008). Determination of penicillin G and its degradation products in a penicillin production wastewater treatment plant and the receiving river. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.