Cited by 460Coagulation and Flocculation StudiesMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesWater Treatment and Disinfection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissolved air flotation and me

Edzwald, James K.·2010·Water Research

Abstract

This paper is mainly a critical review of the literature and an assessment of what we know about dissolved air flotation (DAF). A few remarks are made at the outset about the author's personal journey in DAF research, his start and its progression. DAF has been used for several decades in drinking water treatment as an alternative clarification method to sedimentation. DAF is particularly effective in treating reservoir water supplies; those supplies containing algae, natural color or natural organic matter; and those with low mineral turbidity. It is more efficient than sedimentation in removing turbidity and particles for these type supplies. Furthermore, it is more efficient in removing Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts. In the last 20 years, fundamental models were developed that provide a basis for understanding the process, optimizing it, and integrating it into water treatment plants. The theories were tested through laboratory and pilot-plant studies. Consequently, there have been trends in which DAF pretreatment has been optimized resulting in better coagulation and a decrease in the size of flocculation tanks. In addition, the hydraulic loading rates have increased reducing the size of DAF processes. While DAF has been used mainly in conventional type water plants, there is now interest in the technology as a pretreatment step in ultrafiltration membrane plants and in desalination reverse osmosis plants.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2009.12.040

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Edzwald, J. K.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Edzwald, James K.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
2077-2106
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013603630
Cited by
460
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
14.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
dissolved air flotation, drinking water treatment, reservoir water, turbidity removal, Giardia cysts, Cryptosporidium oocysts, algae, natural organic matter, coagulation, flocculation, hydraulic loading rate, ultrafiltration pretreatment, reverse osmosis pretreatment, process modeling
MeSH terms
Air, Algorithms, Cryptosporidium, Solubility, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water, Water Microbiology, Water Supply, Water Purification, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review