Cited by 76Water Treatment and DisinfectionFecal contamination and water qualityAdvanced oxidation water treatment

Disinfection by-product dynamics in a chlorinated, indoor swimming pool under conditions of heavy use: national swimming competition

Weng, ShihChi, Blatchley, Ernest R.·2011·Water Research

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence suggests that water quality in chlorinated, indoor pools deteriorates under conditions of heavy use. However, data to define these dynamics have not been reported. To address this issue, a study was performed in which water chemistry was monitored in a chlorinated, indoor pool before and during a national swimming competition, a period of heavy, intense use. NCl3 concentration was observed to double after the first day, and increased by a factor of 3-4 over the 4 days of competition. CNCHCl2 and CH3NCl2 concentrations both increased by a factor of 2-3 during the course of the meet, while CHCl3 concentration showed only a modest increase during this same period. Diurnal patterns of NCl3, CH3NCl2 and CHCl3 concentrations were observed, and these patterns appeared to depend on the Henry's law constant of the compound. Urea concentration showed a diurnal pattern, superimposed on a trend of steady increase during each day of the competition; however, the diurnal pattern of urea behavior could not be explained by reactions with chlorine, as the urea-free chlorine reaction is relatively slow. It is more likely that the overnight decrease in urea concentration was attributable to mixing of surface water with water in the deeper parts of the pool. The findings of this study provide an indication of the changes in pool water chemistry that take place in a chlorinated, indoor pool under heavy use conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.027

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weng, S., & Blatchley, E. R.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Blatchley, Ernest R.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
45
Issue
16
Pages
5241-5248
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992050570
Cited by
76
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
Keywords
disinfection by-products, trichloramine, chloroform, cyanogen chloride, diurnal variation, Henry's law constant, urea, water quality, chlorine disinfection
MeSH terms
Chlorine, Disinfectants, Humans, Swimming, Swimming Pools, Volatile Organic Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review