Cited by 164Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Quaternized Magnetic Microspheres for the Efficient Removal of Reactive Dyes

Shuang, Chendong, Li, Penghui, Li, Aimin, Zhou, Qing, Zhang, Mancheng, Zhou, Yang·2012·Water Research

Abstract

In this paper, a novel quaternized magnetic resin, NDMP, was prepared and characterized. Two reactive dyes (RDs), Orange G (OG) and red RWO, were used as a small-molecular RD and large-molecular RD, respectively, to investigate their adsorption on NDMP. A common quaternized magnetic resin, MIEX, was selected for comparison. The adsorption kinetics of OG onto both resins and the adsorption kinetics of RWO onto NDMP followed pseudo-second-order kinetics, whereas the adsorption of RWO onto MIEX was better fitted by pseudo-first-order kinetics. The experimental data illustrated that the equilibrium adsorption amount of both RDs onto NDMP (1.9 mmol OG/g, 0.70 mmol RWO/g) was twice as large as that on MIEX (1.0 mmol OG/g, 0.35 mmol RWO/g). The Langmuir equation and the Freundlich model fit the isotherm data for OG and RWO adsorption, respectively. The adsorption of OG on the NDMP and MIEX resins declined in the presence of NaCl or Na₂SO₄. The effects of the salts on the adsorption of RWO were different. The recyclability of NDMP and MIEX were also evaluated. This work provides a reusable efficient adsorbent for the removal of RDs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.052

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adsorption technique is considered simple and effective and has garnered significant attention in recent studies, particularly for adhesion dyes.

    “The adsorption technique, considered for its simplicity and effectiveness, has garnered significant attention in recent studies, particularly in the context of adhesion dyes [18,19].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 164

Authors
Shuang, C., Li, P., Li, A., Zhou, Q., Zhang, M., & Zhou, Y.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Penghui
  • Li, Aimin
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
46
Issue
14
Pages
4417-4426
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994117666
Cited by
164
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 15
FWCI
17.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
reactive dyes, dye adsorption, Orange G, adsorption kinetics, adsorption isotherms, adsorbent reusability, dye removal
MeSH terms
Acrylic Resins, Adsorption, Azo Compounds, Coloring Agents, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Ion Exchange Resins, Kinetics, Magnetics, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Microspheres, Salts, Solutions, Temperature, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Static Electricity, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review