Enhancing future resilience in urban drainage system: Green versus grey infrastructure
Abstract
In recent years, the concept transition from fail-safe to safe-to-fail makes the application of resilience analysis popular in urban drainage systems (UDSs) with various implications and quantifications. However, most existing definitions of UDSs resilience are confined to the severity of flooding, while uncertainties from climate change and urbanization are not considered. In this research, we take into account the functional variety, topological complexity, and disturbance randomness of UDSs and define a new formula of resilience based on three parts of system severity, i.e. social severity affected by urban flooding, environmental severity caused by sewer overflow, and technological severity considering the safe operation of downstream facilities. A case study in Kunming, China is designed to compare the effect of green and grey infrastructure strategies on the enhancement of system resilience together with their costs. Different system configurations with green roofs, permeable pavement and storage tanks are compared by scenario analysis with full consideration of future uncertainties induced by urbanization and climate change. The research contributes to the development of sustainability assessment of urban drainage system with consideration of the resilience of green and grey infrastructure under future change. Finding the response measures with high adaptation across a variety of future scenarios is crucial to establish sustainable urban drainage system in a long term.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Green infrastructure has the potential to mitigate increased stormwater runoff resulting from future climate more effectively than existing gray infrastructure.
“Climate change will likely exacerbate urban flooding, and green infrastructure (an acceptable BMP) has the potential to mitigate increased stormwater runoff resulting from future climate more effectively than existing gray infrastructure (Dong et al. 2017;Harris 2018;Giese et al. 2019;Ramsey et al. 2019).”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Dong et al. 2017
Climate change will likely exacerbate urban flooding.
“Climate change will likely exacerbate urban flooding, and green infrastructure (an acceptable BMP) has the potential to mitigate increased stormwater runoff resulting from future climate more effectively than existing gray infrastructure (Dong et al. 2017;Harris 2018;Giese et al. 2019;Ramsey et al. 2019).”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Dong et al. 2017
Cites
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Flood Risk in Urban Areas: Modelling, Management and Adaptation to Climate Change. A Review
Cea, L., & Costabile, P. (2022) · Hydrology · doi:10.3390/hydrology9030050 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Wang, M., Sun, C., & Zhang, D. (2023) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.116701 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities
Rieck, L., Carson, C., Hawley, R. J., Heller, M., Paul, M., Scoggins, M., Zimmerman, M., & Smith, R. F. (2022) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-021-01179-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dong, X., Guo, H., & Zeng, S.
- Affiliations
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zeng, Siyu
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 124
- Pages
- 280-289
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2736010022
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15
- FWCI
- 11.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Water Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51308320, 71473148)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Keywords
- urban drainage, resilience engineering, green infrastructure, grey infrastructure, urban flooding, sewer overflows, green roofs, permeable pavement, storage tanks, climate change uncertainty, urbanization, sustainable urban drainage systems, cost comparison, Kunming
- MeSH terms
- China, Cities, Drainage, Sanitary, Environment Design, Models, Theoretical, Floods, Climate Change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review