Cited by 101Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Polymer-clay composite geomedia for sorptive removal of trace organic compounds and metals in urban stormwater

Open access
Ray, Jessica R., Shabtai, Itamar A., Teixidó, Marc, Mishael, Yael G., Sedlak, David L.·2019·Water Research

Abstract

Functionalized polymer-clay composites were developed and characterized as engineered geomedia for trace contaminant removal during infiltration of urban runoff. Montmorillonite clays were functionalized with either poly(diallyldimethylammonium) chloride (PDADMAC) or poly(4-vinylpyridine-co-styrene) (PVPcoS) to enhance organic compound sorption using a simple, scalable synthesis method. Seven representative trace organic compounds and six trace metals were employed to assess the performance of the polymer-clay composites relative to biochar (i.e., an adsorbent proposed for similar purposes) in batch sorption and column studies under simulated stormwater conditions. Contaminant and geomedia electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, and the presence of natural organic matter (NOM) affected sorption. In batch studies, polymer-clay composites exhibited similar performance to biochar for perfluoroalkyl substance removal, but had lower affinity for polar pesticides and tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate. Oxyanion removal was greatest for positively-charged PDADMAC-clay composites (particularly Cr[VI]), while PVPcoS-clay composites removed over 95% of Ni, Cd, and Cu. NOM decreased removal of all organic compounds, but increased trace metal removal on clay composites due to sorption of NOM-complexed metals. Polymer-clay composite-amended columns best removed oxyanions, while biochar-amended columns exhibited superior removal for all trace organics. At 3 wt% geomedia-sand loading, clay c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.097

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, J. R., Shabtai, I. A., Teixidó, M., Mishael, Y. G., & Sedlak, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Sedlak, David L.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
157
Pages
454-462
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2933299050
Cited by
101
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water Research (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
polymer-clay composites, urban stormwater, trace organic contaminants, trace metals, sorption, montmorillonite, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), biochar, perfluorinated compounds, oxyanion removal, natural organic matter, hydraulic conductivity, infiltration, tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate, pesticides
MeSH terms
Clay, Adsorption, Metals, Organic Chemicals, Polymers, Silicon Dioxide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review