The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sulfidation mitigates the passivation of zero valent iron at alkaline pHs: Experimental evidences and mechanism
Abstract
Groundwater pH is one of the most important geochemical parameters in controlling the interfacial reactions of zero-valent iron (ZVI) with water and contaminants. Ball milled, microscale ZVI (mZVIbm) efficiently dechlorinated TCE at initial stage (<24 h) at pH 6-7 but got passivated at later stage due to pH rise caused by iron corrosion. At pH > 9, mZVIbm almost completely lost its reactivity. In contrast, ball milled, sulfidated microscale ZVI (S-mZVIbm) didn't experience any reactivity loss during the whole reaction stage across pH 6-10 and could efficiently dechlorinate TCE at pH 10 with a reaction rate of 0.03 h-1. Increasing pH from 6 to 9 also enhanced electron utilization efficiency from 0.95% to 5.3%, and from 3.2% to 22%, for mZVIbm and S-mZVIbm, respectively. SEM images of the reacted particles showed that the corrosion product layer on S-mZVIbm had a puffy/porous structure while that on mZVIbm was dense, which may account for the mitigated passivation of S-mZVIbm under alkaline pHs. Density functional theory calculations show that covered S atoms on the Fe(100) surface weaken the interactions of H2O molecules with Fe surfaces, which renders the sulfidated Fe surface inefficient for H2O dissociation and resistant to surface passivation. The observation from this study provides important implication that natural sulfidation of ZVI may largely contribute to the long-term (>10 years) efficiency of TCE decontamination by permeable reactive barriers with pore water pH above 9.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Skúlason, E., Tripkovic, V., Björketun, M. E., Gudmundsdóttir, S., Karlberg, G., Rossmeisl, J., Bligaard, T., Jónsson, H., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp1048887 · Cited by 1,271
Sheng, W., Myint, M., Chen, J. G., & Yan, Y. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee00045a · Cited by 1,202
Sheng, W., Zhuang, Z., Gao, M., Zheng, J., Chen, J. G., & Yan, Y. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6848 · Cited by 1,136
Cited by
Zhang, S., Hedtke, T., Zhu, Q., Sun, M., Weon, S., Zhao, Y., Stavitski, E., Elimelech, M., & Kim, J.-H. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c01391 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, Y., Gong, L., Qi, J., Cai, S., Tu, W., & He, F.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 159
- Pages
- 233-241
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944395976
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfidation mitigates the passivation of zero valent iron at alkaline pHs: Experimental evidences and mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.061
- The paper
- Gu, Y., Gong, L., Qi, J., Cai, S., Tu, W., & He, F. (2019). Sulfidation mitigates the passivation of zero valent iron at alkaline pHs: Experimental evidences and mechanism. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.