Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 512

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of water quality in the South-to-North Water Diversion Project of China using the water quality index (WQI) method

Nong, Xizhi, Shao, Dongguo, Zhong, Hua, Liang, Jiankui·2020·Water Research

Abstract

The world's longest trans-basin water diversion project, the Middle-Route (MR) of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project of China (SNWDPC), has officially been in operation for over 5 years since December 2014. Its water quality status has always attracted special attention because it is related to the health and safety of more than 58 million people and the integrity of an ecosystem covering more than 155,000 km2. This study presented and analysed the spatio-temporal variations and trends of 16 water quality parameters, including pH, water temperature (WT), dissolved oxygen (DO), permanganate index (PI), five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), fecal coliform (F. coli), total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), sulphate (SO42-), fluoride (F-), mercury (Hg), arsenic (As), selenium (Se), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn), which were determined monthly from samples collected at 27 water quality monitoring stations in the MR of the SNWDPC from March 2016 to February 2019. The water quality index (WQI) was used to evaluate the seasonal and spatial water quality changes during the monitoring period, and a new WQImin model consisting of five crucial parameters, i.e., TP, F. coli, Hg, WT, and DO, was built by using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. The results demonstrated that the water quality status of the MR of the SNWDPC has been steadily maintained at an "excellent" level during the monitoring period, with an overall average WQI value of 90.39 and twelve seasonal mean WQI values ranging from 87.67 to 91.82. The proposed WQImin model that uses the selected five key parameters and the weights of those parameters has exhibited excellent performance in the water quality assessment of the project, with the coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Percentage Error (PE) values of 0.901, 2.21, 1.93%, respectively, showing that the proposed WQImin model is a useful and efficient tool to evaluate and manage the water quality. For the management department, the risk sources near certain stations with abnormally high values should be carefully inspected and strictly managed to maintain excellent water quality. The potential risks of algae proliferation in this project should be of concern in future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115781

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 512

Metadata

Authors
Nong, X., Shao, D., Zhong, H., & Liang, J.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
178
Pages
115781
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3018066304
Cited by
512
References
44
FWCI
18.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of water quality in the South-to-North Water Diversion Project of China using the water quality index (WQI) method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115781
The paper
Nong, X., Shao, D., Zhong, H., & Liang, J. (2020). Evaluation of water quality in the South-to-North Water Diversion Project of China using the water quality index (WQI) method. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115781

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.