Bioretention cells remove microplastics from urban stormwater
Abstract
Microplastic pathways in the environment must be better understood to help select appropriate mitigation strategies. In this 2-year long field study, microplastics were characterized and quantified in urban stormwater runoff and through a bioretention cell, a type of low impact development infrastructure. Concentrations of microparticles ranged from below the detection limit to 704 microparticles/L and the dominant morphology found were fibers. High rainfall intensity and longer antecedent dry days resulted in larger microparticle concentrations. In addition, atmospheric deposition was a source of microplastics to urban runoff. Overall, these results demonstrate that urban stormwater runoff is a concentrated source of microplastics whose concentrations depend on specific climate variables. The bioretention cell showed an 84% decrease in median microparticle concentration in the 106-5,000 µm range, and thus is effective in filtering out microplastics and preventing their spread to downstream environments. Altogether, these results highlight the large contribution of urban stormwater runoff to microplastic contamination in larger aquatic systems and demonstrate the potential for current infiltration-based low impact development practices to limit the spread of microplastic contamination downstream.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bioretention systems remove between 84% and 90% of microplastics from stormwater influent.
“bioretention systems have shown to remove between (84 % -90 %) of microplastics from stormwater influent (Gilbreath et al., 2019; Smyth et al., 2021; Stang et al., 2022)”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Smyth et al., 2021
Rubbery tire particles and fibers compose the greatest percentage of microplastics in urban bioretention basins.
“where rubbery tire particles and fibers compose the greatest percentage of microplastics”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Smyth et al., 2021
Tire wear particles are lower in the outlet than the inlet of bioretention due to physical filtration of the particles in bioretention media.
“it has been observed that tire wear particles are lower in the outlet than the inlet of bioretention due to physical filtra tion of the particles in bioretention media (Smyth et al., 2021).”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Smyth et al., 2021
Cites
Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2031505 · Cited by 5,440 · see citing works
Human Consumption of Microplastics
Cox, K. D., Covernton, G. A., Davies, H. L., Dower, J. F., Juanes, F., & Dudas, S. E. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b01517 · Cited by 2,745 · see citing works
Impacts of polystyrene microplastic on the gut barrier, microbiota and metabolism of mice
Jin, Y., Lu, L., Tu, W., Luo, T., & Fu, Z. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.353 · Cited by 1,100 · see citing works
Microplastics entering northwestern Lake Ontario are diverse and linked to urban sources
Grbić, J., Helm, P., Athey, S., & Rochman, C. M. (2020) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.115623 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mayer, P. M., Moran, K. D., Miller, E. L., Brander, S. M., Harper, S., Garcia-Jaramillo, M., Carrasco-Navarro, V., Ho, K. T., Burgess, R. M., Thornton Hampton, L. M., et al. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171153 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Bodus, B., O'Malley, K., Dieter, G., Gunawardana, C., & McDonald, W. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167195 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smyth, K., Drake, J., Li, Y., Rochman, C., Van Seters, T., & Passeport, E.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 191
- Pages
- 116785
- ISSN
- 0043-1354
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review