CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recovering and reuse of textile dyes from dyebath effluent using surfactant driven forward osmosis to achieve zero hazardous chemical discharge

Yasmeen, Maria, Nawaz, Muhammad Saqib, Khan, Sher Jamal, Ghaffour, Noreddine, Khan, Muhammad Zafar·2023·Water Research
DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119524
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This experimental study explores the feasibility of the reuse of dyes recovered from denim and polyester dyebath effluents using forward osmosis (FO) system to achieve zero hazardous material discharge. In batch experiments, the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 0.5 M concentration generated an average flux of 3.5 L/m 2 /h (LMH) and reverse salt flux (RSF) of only 0.012 g/m 2 /h (GMH), while maintaining 100% dye rejection. This flux stability comes from the property of surfactants to form micelles and exert a stable osmotic pressure (π) above their critical micelle concentration (CMC). The low RSF is due to the greater micelle size. A colored fouling layer was formed on the membrane active layer (AL), which was easily removed using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and citric acid. According to Fourier transform infrared spectra and atomic forces microscopy images of the AL, the interaction between foulants and membrane active groups did not significantly affect the physiochemical properties of the membrane. In the semi-continuous experiment, a very stable average flux of 7.3 LMH and RSF of 0.03 GMH was obtained using 0.75 M SDS as draw solution. The stacked 1D proton nuclear magnetic resonance analysis ( 1 HNMR) spectra of both original and recovered disperse dyes showed 100% similarity, which validates the concept that the recovered dyes maintained their integrity during reconcentration and can be reused in the next batch dyeing process. Importantly, the diluted SDS concentration can b…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119524

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Abbasi, 2021, Optimization of nutrient rich solution for direct fertigation using novel side stream anaerobic forward osmosis process to treat textile wastewater, J. Environ. Manag., 300, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113691 · DOI
  2. Alamoudi, 2022, Optimization of osmotic backwashing cleaning protocol for produced water fouled forward osmosis membranes, J. Memb. Sci., 663, 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121013 · DOI
  3. Arslan-Alaton, 2008, Treatability of a simulated spent disperse dyebath by chemical and electrochemical processes, Environ. Eng. Sci., 25, 295, 10.1089/ees.2006.0243 · DOI
  4. Aygun, 2021, Electrocoagulation of disperse dyebath wastewater: optimization of process variables and sludge production, J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol., 12, 82, 10.33961/jecst.2020.00787 · DOI
  5. Badani, 2009, Membrane separation process for the treatment and reuse of bath dye effluents, Desalin. Water Treat, 9, 105, 10.5004/dwt.2009.758 · DOI
  6. Basit, 2018, The mechanical and comfort properties of viscose with cotton and regenerated fibers blended woven fabrics, Mater. Sci., 24, 230
  7. Bell, 2017, Produced water treatment using forward osmosis membranes: evaluation of extended-time performance and fouling, J. Memb. Sci., 525, 77, 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.032 · DOI
  8. Berradi, 2019, Textile finishing dyes and their impact on aquatic environs, Heliyon, 5, e02711, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02711 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cai, 2016, A critical review on draw solutes development for forward osmosis, Desalination, 391, 16, 10.1016/j.desal.2016.03.021 · DOI
  10. Cerqueira, 2009, Electroflocculation for textile wastewater treatment, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 26, 659, 10.1590/S0104-66322009000400004 · DOI
  11. Chatterjee, 2001, Thermodynamics of micelle formation of ionic surfactants: a critical assessment for sodium dodecyl sulfate, cetyl pyridinium chloride and dioctyl sulfosuccinate (Na salt) by microcalorimetric, conductometric, and tensiometric measurements, J. Phys. Chem., 105, 12823, 10.1021/jp0123029 · DOI
  12. Epolito, 2008, Kinetics of zero-valent iron reductive transformation of the anthraquinone dye Reactive Blue 4, J. Hazard. Mater., 160, 594, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.033 · DOI
  13. Gadelha, 2014, Assessment of micellar solutions as draw solutions for forward osmosis, Desalination, 354, 97, 10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.009 · DOI
  14. Giagnorio, 2019, Desalination of brackish groundwater and reuse of wastewater by forward osmosis coupled with nanofiltration for draw solution recovery, Water Res., 153, 134, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.01.014 · DOI
  15. Han, 2016, Combination of forward osmosis (FO) process with coagulation/flocculation (CF) for potential treatment of textile wastewater, Water Res., 91, 361, 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.031 · DOI
  16. He, 2020, Nonylphenol ethoxylates biodegradation increases estrogenicity of textile wastewater in biological treatment systems, Water Res., 184, 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116137 · DOI
  17. Hussein, 2013, Chemical properties of treated textile dyeing wastewater, Asian J. Chem., 25
  18. Im, 2021, Real-time fouling monitoring and membrane autopsy analysis in forward osmosis for wastewater reuse, Water Res., 197, 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117098 · DOI
  19. Karunakaran, 2021, Effects of temperature, pH, feed, and fertilizer draw solution concentrations on the performance of forward osmosis process for textile wastewater treatment, Water Environ. Res., 93, 2329, 10.1002/wer.1607 · DOI
  20. Ketema, 2020, Review on intermolecular forces between dyes used for polyester dyeing and polyester fiber, J. Chem., 2020, 10.1155/2020/6628404 · DOI
  21. Khalid, 2021, Assessment of wastewater quality of paharang drain and its impact on the ground water quality of adjacent areas, Int. J. Econ. Environ. Geol., 11, 6
  22. Lellis, 2019, Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms, Biotechnol. Res. Innov., 3, 275, 10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Li, 2020, Feasibility of concentrating textile wastewater using a hybrid forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD) process: performance and economic evaluation, Water Res., 172, 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115488 · DOI
  24. Li, 2019, Concentration and recovery of dyes from textile wastewater using a self-standing, support-free forward osmosis membrane, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 3078, 10.1021/acs.est.9b00446 · DOI
  25. Malik, 2021, Treatment of high-strength synthetic textile wastewater through anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor and effect of sludge characteristics on flux, Environ. Qual. Manag., 31, 85, 10.1002/tqem.21756 · DOI
  26. Manikandan, 2022, A critical review of advanced nanotechnology and hybrid membrane based water recycling, reuse, and wastewater treatment processes, Chemosphere, 289, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132867 · DOI
  27. Manzoor, 2022, Woven-fiber microfiltration coupled with anaerobic forward osmosis membrane bioreactor treating textile wastewater: use of fertilizer draw solutes for direct fertigation, Biochem. Eng. J., 181, 108385, 10.1016/j.bej.2022.108385 · DOI
  28. Mendoza, 2022, Exploring the limitations of forward osmosis for direct hydroponic fertigation: impact of ion transfer and fertilizer composition on effective dilution, J. Environ. Manag., 305, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114339 · DOI
  29. Miled, 2010, Decolorization of high polluted textile wastewater by indirect electrochemical oxidation process, J. Textile Appar. Technol. Manag., 6
  30. Moreira, 2022, Process development for textile wastewater treatment towards zero liquid discharge: integrating membrane separation process and advanced oxidation techniques, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 157, 537, 10.1016/j.psep.2021.10.037 · DOI
  31. Nawaz, 2022, Effect of colder stream temperature control on energy utilization, flux, RSF, and membrane integrity in asymmetric temperature FO systems, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 161, 67, 10.1016/j.psep.2022.02.070 · DOI
  32. Nawaz, 2022, Performance and implications of forward osmosis-membrane distillation hybrid system for simultaneous treatment of different real produced water streams, Chem. Eng. J., 450
  33. Nawaz, 2013, Effect of HRT on SBR performance for treatability of combined domestic and textile wastewaters, J. Chem. Soc. Pak., 35, 527
  34. Nawaz, 2016, Reverse solute transport, microbial toxicity, membrane cleaning and flux of regenerated draw in the FO-MBR using a micellar draw solution, Desalination, 391, 105, 10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.023 · DOI
  35. Nawaz, 2019, Impact of osmotic backwashing, particle size distribution and feed-side cross-flow velocity on flux in the forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FO-MBR), J. Water Process Eng., 31, 100861
  36. Nawaz, 2021, Investigation of flux stability and fouling mechanism during simultaneous treatment of different produced water streams using forward osmosis and membrane distillation, Water Res., 198, 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117157 · DOI
  37. Niraula, 2014, Sodium dodecylsulphate: a very useful surfactant for scientific investigations, J. Knowl. Innov., 2, 111
  38. Phuntsho, 2012, Influence of temperature and temperature difference in the performance of forward osmosis desalination process, J. Memb. Sci., 415, 734, 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.065 · DOI
  39. Pinheiro, 2022, Degradation of Azo dyes: bacterial potential for bioremediation, Sustainability, 14, 1510, 10.3390/su14031510 · DOI
  40. Regupathi, I., Shetty, V. and Thanabalan, M. 2016. Recent advances in chemical engineering: select proceedings of ICACE 2015. · DOI
  41. Roach, 2014, Use of micellar solutions as draw agents in forward osmosis, J. Surfactants Deterg., 17, 1241, 10.1007/s11743-014-1638-6 · DOI
  42. Ryu, 2020, Nutrient-driven forward osmosis coupled with microalgae cultivation for energy efficient dewatering of microalgae, Algal. Res., 48, 10.1016/j.algal.2020.101880 · DOI
  43. Saini, 2017, Textile organic dyes: polluting effects and elimination methods from textile waste water, Int. J. Chem. Eng. Res., 9, 121
  44. Sark, 2021, Improving the structural parameter of the membrane sublayer for enhanced forward osmosis, Membranes, 11, 448, 10.3390/membranes11060448 · DOI
  45. Son, 2020, Impact of osmotic and thermal isolation barrier on concentration and temperature polarization and energy efficiency in a novel FO-MD integrated module, J. Memb. Sci.
  46. Tavangar, 2019, Toward real textile wastewater treatment: membrane fouling control and effective fractionation of dyes/inorganic salts using a hybrid electrocoagulation–nanofiltration process, Sep. Purif. Technol., 216, 115, 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.01.070 · DOI
  47. Tayel, 2019, Forward osmosis desalination using pectin-coated magnetic nanoparticles as a draw solution, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 21, 1617, 10.1007/s10098-019-01738-5 · DOI
  48. Wang, 2021, Natural organic matter separation by forward osmosis: performance and mechanisms, Water Res., 191, 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116829 · DOI
  49. Wang, 2015, Chemical cleaning protocols for thin film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes used for municipal wastewater treatment, J. Memb. Sci., 475, 184, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.032 · DOI
  50. Zhang, 2021, Enhanced performance of porous forward osmosis (FO) membrane in the treatment of oily wastewater containing HPAM by the incorporation of palygorskite, RSC Adv., 11, 22439, 10.1039/D1RA02858H · DOI
  51. Zhou, 2020, Tuning the surface structure of polyamide membranes using porous carbon nitride nanoparticles for high-performance seawater Desalination, Membranes, 10, 163, 10.3390/membranes10080163 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yasmeen, M., Nawaz, M. S., Khan, S. J., Ghaffour, N., & Khan, M. Z.
ORCID
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
230
Pages
119524
ISSN
0043-1354
DOI
10.1016/j.watres.2022.119524
Cited by
42
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review