Cited by 93Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsWomen's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Qualitative Study of Provider Perspectives of Structural Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening Among First Nations Women

Open access

Abstract

Objective In Canada, opportunistic screening programs have successfully reduced mortality from cervical cancer; however, minority or disadvantaged groups, as well as women in northern and rural areas, are inadequately recruited by this approach. Hence, we set out to examine the structural barriers that prevent First Nations women's participation in cervical cancer screening. Methods Using a participatory action research approach and semistructured interview guides, we conducted in-depth interviews with 18 experienced health care professionals, 12 of whom were also community members. These individuals included nurses, nurse practitioners, community health representatives, social workers and physicians who provide care to women in our First Nations partner communities. In the current report, we explored perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening through the lens of service providers. Results Structural barriers to cervical cancer screening for First Nations women included shortage of appropriate health care providers, lack of a recall-based screening system, geographic and transportation barriers; health literacy and socioeconomic inequalities, generational effects, and the colonial legacy. Conclusion Existing, opportunistic cervical cancer screening programs do not perform well for First Nations women who experience significant screening-related health inequalities that are largely influenced by structural barriers. Sustainable screening interventions in First Nations communities require approaches that resolve these structural barriers, explore new ways of screening, and provide education for both women and health care providers. Many of the structural barriers are rooted in colonial history. Given the negative impact of the consequences of colonization on indigenous women worldwide, many of our findings strongly resonate with marginalized populations in other countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2013.06.005

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Morgan, 1981, The incidence of cancer in Registered Indians of Alberta, 1974–1978, Chronic Diseases in Canada, 2, 33

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maar, M., Burchell, A., Little, J., Ogilvie, G., Severini, A., Yang, J. M., & Zehbe, I.
Affiliations
  • NOSM University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
  • Thunder Bay Regional Research Institute (CA)
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
e319-e325
ISSN
1049-3867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139707328
Cited by
93
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women s Health Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (119344_1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, First Nations women, structural barriers, provider perspectives, health workforce shortage, geographic barriers, transportation barriers, health literacy, socioeconomic disparities, generational effects, colonial legacy, opportunistic screening
MeSH terms
Canada, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Health Personnel, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Indians, North American, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Socioeconomic Factors, Vaginal Smears, Qualitative Research, Healthcare Disparities, Early Detection of Cancer, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review