Cited by 26Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumWork-Family Balance ChallengesReproductive Health and Contraception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maternal Depression, Pregnancy Intention, and Return to Paid Work After Childbirth

Dagher, Rada K., Hofferth, Sandra L., Lee, Yoonjoo·2014·Women's Health Issues

Abstract

Background Maternal depression is an important public health issue for women, their families, and their employers. Previous studies have examined the impact of leave duration on maternal depression, but none have studied the association between maternal depression and the pace of return to paid work. We examine herein the relationship between maternal depression and return to work, and the moderating effects of pregnancy intention.Methods We utilized data from the Listening to Mothers II Survey collected from January 20 through February 21, 2006. The woman had to be 18 to 45 years old, speak English, and have given birth in 2005 to a live singleton baby in a U.S. hospital. Our analyses were limited to women who worked for an employer during pregnancy (n = 882). The primary outcome was return to paid work at the time of the interview and the analyses utilized Cox proportional hazard models.Findings In combination, intending the baby and being depressed suppressed return to paid work. Nondepressed mothers with unintended pregnancies returned to work the soonest. Compared with mothers who were not depressed and with unintended pregnancy, the risk ratio of returning to paid work (0.70) was significantly lower for mothers who were depressed and had an intended pregnancy. Mothers who were not depressed and with intended pregnancy also had a significantly lower risk ratio (0.60) of returning to paid work than those who were not depressed and with unintended pregnancy.Conclusion Primary care providers and policy makers can use these findings to support employed women in their childbearing years.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.002

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Terhanian, 2000, Correcting data from online surveys for the effects of nonrandom selection and nonrandom assignment, Harris Interactive White Paper, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Dagher, R. K., Hofferth, S. L., & Lee, Y.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
e297-e303
ISSN
1049-3867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138217355
Cited by
26
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women s Health Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
maternal depression, pregnancy intention, unintended pregnancy, postpartum employment, maternal employment during pregnancy, moderating effect
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Employment, Female, Humans, Infant, Maternal Behavior, Mothers, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Depression, Postpartum, Intention, Parturition, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal Depression, Pregnancy Intention, and Return to Paid Work After Childbirth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.002
The paper
Dagher, R. K., Hofferth, S. L., & Lee, Y. (2014). Maternal Depression, Pregnancy Intention, and Return to Paid Work After Childbirth. Women's Health Issues. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.002