Cited by 56Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersTreatment of Major Depression

Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Taghva, Alexander S., Malone, Donald A., Rezai, Ali R.·2013·World Neurosurgery

Abstract

Background Major depressive disorder is a common and disabling illness and is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite aggressive medical, behavioral, and electroconvulsive therapies, a significant number of patients remain refractory to treatment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has proven efficacy in neurobehavioral disorders and, in a general sense, works by modulation of corticostriatopallidothalamocortical circuits implicated in these disorders. Methods Current data, treatment rationales, and future directions are presented. Results The two targets most commonly used for DBS in treatment-resistant depression are the subgenual cingulate gyrus and the ventral capsule/ventral striatum. Data on DBS of these regions are preliminary, with promise shown in early studies. Conclusions Early work suggests DBS may become a therapeutic option in treatment-resistant depression. Further study is justified given the immense burden of disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.10.068

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carbon-nanotube-based electrical stimulation utilizes unidirectional electrical stimulation, which is more precise and avoids the surgical risks associated with deep macroelectrode insertion used with current methods of deep brain stimulation.

    “This strategy utilizes unidirectional electrical stimulation, which is more precise and avoids the surgical risks associated with deep macroelectrode insertion, used with current methods of deep brain stimulation”

    From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Taghva et al., 2013

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 56

Authors
Taghva, A. S., Malone, D. A., & Rezai, A. R.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Taghva, Alexander S.
Venue
World Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
80
Issue
3-4
Pages
S27.e17-S27.e24
ISSN
1878-8750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083281978
Cited by
56
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medtronic Neurological
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, ventral capsule/ventral striatum
MeSH terms
Corpus Striatum, Drug Resistance, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Neural Pathways, Neurosurgery, Nucleus Accumbens, Stereotaxic Techniques, Internal Capsule, Deep Brain Stimulation, History, 20th Century, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review