Cited by 9Surgical Simulation and TrainingSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareAnatomy and Medical Technology

Simulation in spinal surgery and the transition from novice to expert

Pereira, Erlick A.C., Aziz, Tipu Z.·2015·World Neurosurgery

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.066

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pereira, E. A. C., & Aziz, T. Z.
Affiliations
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Aziz, Tipu Z.
Venue
World Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
84
Issue
6
Pages
1511-1512
ISSN
1878-8750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2212450671
Cited by
9
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
simulation-based training, spinal surgery, neurosurgical training, simulator validity, non-technical skills, pediatric neurosurgery, interventional neuroradiology, skill transfer, novice to expert transition
MeSH terms
Dura Mater, Foramen Magnum, Humans, Internship and Residency, Neurosurgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review