Cited by 40Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchDiversity and Career in Medicine

Neurosurgery Resident Wellness and Recovery from Burnout: A 39-Year Single-Institution Experience

Tang, Oliver Y., Dunn, Katherine A., Yoon, James S., Ponce, Francisco A., Sonntag, Volker K.H., Lawton, Michael T.·2020·World Neurosurgery

Abstract

Objective Physician burnout in neurosurgery is highly prevalent and occurs most severely during residency. Although earlier assessments have identified stressors contributing to neurosurgery resident burnout, recovery interventions have not been studied extensively. We aimed to characterize burnout patterns and factors contributing to recovery through a single-institution assessment of neurosurgery residents across 4 decades. Methods We administered a 59-item questionnaire to all living current and former residents of a large neurosurgical training institution (n = 96). Respondents indicated the timeline of burnout or hardship during residency and evaluated burnout stressors and recovery factors through a 5-point Likert scale and free-text response. Results The survey response rate was 67% (64 of 96). The overall self-reported burnout rate was 30% (19 of 64). Recent trainees were significantly more likely to report burnout (P < 0.05). Postgraduate year 2 was cited by 66% of respondents as the onset of burnout or hardship. The most common stressors included work-life imbalance (55%) and imbalance of resident duties (33%). The highest-impact recovery factors were end of a rotation or postgraduate year (80%), increased sleep (48%), and meaningful relationships with colleagues (42%). Institution-specific factors, such as outdoor activities (52%) and intraprogram social events (34%), were also influential in recovery. In free-text responses, respondents identified a strong sense of mission in neurosurgical training as a central driver of recovery to wellness. Conclusions Institutional support structures promoting mentorship and camaraderie are actionable methods to encourage resident burnout recovery. This study serves as a model for other programs to identify their "critical periods" of burnout and effective wellness interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.236

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, O. Y., Dunn, K. A., Yoon, J. S., Ponce, F. A., Sonntag, V. K. H., & Lawton, M. T.
Affiliations
Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Lawton, Michael T.
Venue
World Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
138
Pages
e72-e81
ISSN
1878-8750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004801238
Cited by
40
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
physician burnout, neurosurgery residents, burnout recovery, resident well-being, work-life imbalance, sleep, mentoring, camaraderie, sense of mission, institutional support
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Mentors, Middle Aged, Neurosurgery, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review