Cited by 32Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting IssuesMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsUreteral procedures and complications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A survey of Australian midwives’ knowledge, experience, and training needs in relation to female genital mutilation

Open access

Abstract

Background Female genital mutilation (FGM) involves partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or any other injury for non-medical reasons. Due to international migration patterns, health professionals in high income countries are increasingly caring for women with FGM. Few studies explored the knowledge and skills of midwives in high income countries.Aim To explore the knowledge, experience and needs of midwives in relation to the care of women with FGM.Methods An online self-administered descriptive survey was designed and advertised through the Australian College of Midwives' website.Results Of the 198 midwives (24%) did not know the correct classification of FGM. Almost half of the respondents (48%) reported they had not received FGM training during their midwifery education. Midwives (8%) had been asked, or knew of others who had been asked to perform FGM in Australia. Many midwives were not clear about the law or health data related to FGM and were not aware of referral paths for affected women.Conclusion As frontline providers, midwives must have appropriate up-to-date clinical skills and knowledge to ensure they are able to provide women with FGM the care they need and deserve. Midwives have a critical role to play in the collection of FGM related data to assist with health service planning and to prevent FGM by working closely with women and communities they serve to educate and advocate for its abandonment. Therefore, addressing educational gaps and training needs are key strategies to deliver optimal quality of care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.06.009

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While medicalized FGM/C is found in greatest concentration in Egypt, Sudan, and Nigeria, health professionals in countries around the world have been approached with requests to cut girls and women.

    “While medicalized FGM/C is found in greatest concentration in three countries (Egypt, Sudan, and Nigeria), health professionals in countries around the world have been approached with requests to cut girls and women [ 49 – 53 ].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. ACM, 2016
  2. ACN, ACM. FGM Learning Australia: Australian Government 2014 [cited 16 November 2016]. Available from: http://www.fgmlearning.org.au/.
  3. Australian Government. Review of Australia’s Female Genital Mutilation legal framework. Report. ACT, Australia Australian Government, 2013 March 2013. Report No.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Turkmani, S., Homer, C., Varol, N., & Dawson, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Turkmani, Sabera
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
25-30
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2728359948
Cited by
32
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Health System Capacity Development Flexible Fund of the Australian Commonwealth, Department of Health and Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Ureteral procedures and complications
Keywords
female genital mutilation, midwives, midwifery knowledge, FGM prevention, referral pathways, migrant women's health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Nurse Midwives, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Circumcision, Female, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review