Women’s experiences of birth trauma: A scoping review
Abstract
Background A high number of Australian women report experiencing traumatic birth events. Despite high incidence and potential wide spread and long-lasting effects, birth trauma is poorly recognised and insufficiently treated. Birth trauma can trigger ongoing psychosocial symptoms for women, including anxiety, tokophobia, bonding difficulties, relationship issues and PTSD. Additionally, women's future fertility choices can be inhibited by birth trauma. Aim To summarize the existing literature to provide insight into women's experiences of birth trauma unrelated to a specific pre-existing obstetric or contextual factor. Methods The review follows 5 stages of Arksey and O'Malley's framework. 7 databases were searched using indexed terms and boolen operators. Data searching identified 1354 records, 5 studies met inclusion criteria. Findings Three key themes emerged; (1) health care providers and the maternity care system. (2) Women's sense of knowing and control. (3) Support. Discussion Continuity of carer creates the foundations for facilitative interactions between care provider and woman which increases the likelihood of a positive birth experience. Women are able to gain a sense of feeling informed and being in control when empowering and individualized care is offered. Functional social supports and forms of debriefing promotes psychological processing and can enable post traumatic growth. Conclusion Existing literature highlights how birth trauma is strongly influenced by negative health care provider interactions and dysfunctional operation of the maternity care system. A lack of education and support limited informed decision-making, resulting in feelings of losing control and powerlessness which contributes to women's trauma. Insufficient support further compounds women's experiences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quantitative studies have established prevalence rates of traumatic childbirth, but primarily rely on subjective self-reports or postpartum PTSD scales, which may vary widely and lack standardized assessment tools tailored to the specific experiences of traumatic childbirth.
“While quantitative studies have established prevalence rates of traumatic childbirth, these studies primarily rely on subjective self-reports or postpartum PTSD scales, which may vary widely and lack standardized assessment tools tailored to the specific experiences of traumatic childbirth [14, 15].”
From The traumatic childbirth experience of mothers after emergency cesarean section(EmCS) in China: a descriptive qualitative study (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., et al. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0850 · Cited by 43,565 · see citing works
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 · Cited by 36,742 · see citing works
Social Bonds and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Charuvastra, A., & Cloitre, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085650 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
Yildiz, P. D., Ayers, S., & Phillips, L. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.009 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Forster, D. A., McLachlan, H. L., Davey, M.-A., Biro, M. A., Farrell, T., Gold, L., Flood, M., Shafiei, T., & Waldenström, U. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0798-y · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Preventing traumatic childbirth experiences: 2192 women’s perceptions and views
Hollander, M. H., van Hastenberg, E., van Dillen, J., van Pampus, M. G., de Miranda, E., & Stramrood, C. A. I. (2017) · Archives of Women's Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-017-0729-6 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jackson, L., De Pascalis, L., Harrold, J. A., Fallon, V., & Silverio, S. A. (2021) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-021-04071-2 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Ma, L., Chong, M. C., Lee, W. L., Yang, H., & Lian, Y. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07213-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Watson, K., White, C., Hall, H., & Hewitt, A.
- Affiliations
- Peninsula Health (AU)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Watson, Kristy
- Venue
- Women and Birth
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 417-424
- ISSN
- 1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3089462629
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
- FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- birth trauma, women's experiences, continuity of carer, perceived control, informed decision-making, social support, debriefing, posttraumatic growth, postpartum anxiety, postpartum PTSD, reproductive decision-making, childbirth
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Female, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Qualitative Research, Parturition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review