Cited by 3Innovations in Medical EducationNursing education and managementHealth Sciences Research and Education

Sharing midwifery philosophy through a positive learning environment prepares students for a future providing midwifery continuity of care: A mixed method study

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global and national frameworks for midwifery education recognise and prioritise the provision of midwifery continuity of care. Previous studies report that learning is enhanced when students have professional experience placements within these models, however there remains wide variation in midwifery students' access to placements within these models in Australia. AIM: To evaluate Bachelor of Midwifery students' experiences in midwifery continuity of care models within two local health districts in New South Wales, Australia. METHOD: A mixed methods design was used: qualitative data collected through interviews, and quantitative data collected via an online survey using the Midwifery Student Evaluation of Practice (MidSTEP) tool. Thematic analysis of qualitative data and descriptive analysis of quantitative data was undertaken. RESULTS: Sixteen students responded, four students were interviewed, and 12 students completed the survey. The MidSTEP mean scores for all sub-scales rated above 3.0/4.0. Participants rated 'work across the full scope of midwifery practice' and five out of eight subscales of Philosophy of Midwifery Practice at 100 %. 'Experiences prepare me to be a change agent for maternity service reform' rated the lowest (67 %). Three qualitative themes emerged: care versus carer model; learning experience; and future career as a caseload midwife. CONCLUSION: A mixed method approach using a validated tool to measure student experiences, contributes to the evidence that students value professional experience placements within midwifery continuity of care models. Currently this is not an option for all midwifery students and as midwifery continuity of care models expand, these findings will inform further implementation of student professional experience placement within these models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101808

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sweet, 2014, Enhancing learning in the midwifery continuity of care experiences, Aust. Nurs. Midwifery J., 21, 42

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hainsworth, N., Mollart, L., Prussing, E., Clack, D., & Cummins, A.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Hainsworth, Nicole
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
101808
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402445523
Cited by
3
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
continuity of midwifery care, midwifery education, professional experience placements, midwifery students, caseload midwifery, student learning experience, New South Wales
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Clinical Competence, Continuity of Patient Care, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Learning, Midwifery, New South Wales, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Nursing, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review