The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index
Abstract
The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) measures the empowerment, agency, and inclusion of women in the agricultural sector and comprises two subindexes. The first assesses empowerment of women in five domains, including (1) decisions about agricultural production, (2) access to and decisionmaking power about productive resources, (3) control of use of income, (4) leadership in the community, and (5) time allocation. The second subindex measures the percentage of women whose achievements are at least as high as men in their households and, for women lacking parity, the relative empowerment gap with respect to the male in their household. This article documents the development of the WEAI and presents pilot findings from Bangladesh, Guatemala, and Uganda.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment.
Kabeer, N. (1999) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00125 · Cited by 4,976
Agency and empowerment: a proposal for internationally comparable indicators
IBRAHIM, S., & ALKIRE, S. (2007) · Oxford Development Studies · doi:10.1080/13600810701701897 · Cited by 644
Self-citation
Cited by
Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development
Kanter, D. R., Musumba, M., Wood, S. L. R., Palm, C., Antle, J., Balvanera, P., Dale, V. H., Havlik, P., Kline, K. L., Scholes, R. J., et al. (2018) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.010 · Cited by 346
What dimensions of women’s empowerment in agriculture matter for nutrition in Ghana?
Malapit, H. J. L., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2015) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.02.003 · Cited by 323
Self-citationA Systematic Review of the Measurement of Sustainable Diets
Jones, A. D., Hoey, L., Blesh, J., Miller, L., Green, A., & Shapiro, L. F. (2016) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.115.011015 · Cited by 299
Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900–2012
Sundström, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y.-T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.016 · Cited by 292
Child marriage and associated outcomes in northern Ghana: a cross-sectional study
on behalf of the Ghana LEAP 1000 evaluation team, de Groot, R., Kuunyem, M. Y., & Palermo, T. (2018) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5166-6 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Alkire, S., Meinzen-Dick, R., Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A., Seymour, G., & Vaz, A.
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 71-91
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122810476
- Cited by
- 948
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 69.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
