Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 144Economic Growth and DevelopmentIncome, Poverty, and InequalityEconomic Growth and Productivity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paths to Development: Is there a Bangladesh Surprise?

Open access
Asadullah, M. Niaz, Savoia, Antonio, Mahmud, Wahiduddin·2014·World Development
DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using aggregate indices of education, health, demographic, and gender equality outcomes, we empirically investigate the hypothesis that Bangladesh achieved a higher level of social development compared with countries of similar level of per capita income. Stylized facts and cross-country regression results support this hypothesis for a broad range of dimensions. Further tests show that such achievements do not simply reflect income-mediated channels and social expenditure programs. We conclude by speculating on the role of Bangladesh’s development to sustain the process of growth and on the role of governance and institutional quality for the nexus between growth and development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.013

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Abdullah, 1997, 25years of Bangladesh: An optimistic perspective (Bangladesher pochish bochor: ekti itibacok prekkhit), Bangladesh Unnayan Shomikhya, 14, 1
  2. Ahluwalia, 2004, Development achievements and challenges, Economic and Political Weekly, 39, 4013
  3. Devarajan, 2005, South Asian surprises, Economic and Political Weekly, 40, 4013
  4. Dhume, 2010, Bangladesh, “basket case” no more, The Wall Street Journal
  5. Economist. (2012). Bangladesh: Out of the basket. 3 November, print edition.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Asadullah, M. N., Savoia, A., & Mahmud, W.
Affiliations
  • IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
ORCID
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
62
Pages
138-154
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.013
OpenAlex
W3124937663
Cited by
141
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
22.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
Funders
International Growth Centre
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
Keywords
social development, Bangladesh, per capita income, educational outcomes, health outcomes, gender equality, demographic outcomes, governance, institutional quality, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.