The Effects of Migration on Collective Action in the Commons: Evidence from Rural China
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participation of local users in irrigation governance is crucial, even in instances where external actors have superior technical knowledge.
“Research shows that the participation of local users in irrigation in governance is crucial, even in instances where external actors have superior technical knowledge (Wang, Chen, & Araral, 2016).”
From Collective action in a polycentric water governance system (2018) · cites this paper as Wang, Chen, & Araral, 2016
Cites
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656 · see citing works
Collective action and the evolution of social norms.
Ostrom, E. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.137 · Cited by 4,195 · see citing works
Cicognani, E., Pirini, C., Keyes, C., Joshanloo, M., Rostami, R., & Nosratabadi, M. (2008) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9222-3 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Sense of community, civic engagement and social well‐being in Italian adolescents
Albanesi, C., Cicognani, E., & Zani, B. (2007) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.903 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
What Explains Collective Action in the Commons? Theory and Evidence from the Philippines
Araral, E. (2009) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.002 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding large social-ecological systems: introducing the SESMAD project.
Cox, M. (2014) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/ijc.406 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collective action in a polycentric water governance system
Baldwin, E., McCord, P., Dell'Angelo, J., & Evans, T. (2018) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1810 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Chen, C., & Araral, E.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- 79-93
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2481068653
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 28.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- World Development (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71573151, 71303132)
- Major Program of the National Social Sciences Foundation of China (15ZDB164)
- Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (2014z04083)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Keywords
- rural-urban migration, collective action, commons governance, canal irrigation, groundwater irrigation, common-pool resources, commons management, social capital, sense of community, leadership, economic heterogeneity, rural infrastructure, China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
