Cited by 566Extractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentMining and Resource Management

Reconfiguring frontier spaces: The territorialization of resource control

Open access
Rasmussen, Mattias Borg, Lund, Christian·2018·World Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Rasmussen, M. B., & Lund, C.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
101
Pages
388-399
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613628123
Cited by
566
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
83.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (662770)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
Keywords
territorialization, frontier space, resource control, resource extraction, property regimes, authority, legitimacy, spatial control, liminal space, capitalism, institutional order, borders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review