Cited by 13Poverty, Education, and Child WelfareAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The challenges of scaling effective interventions: A path forward for research and policy

Open access
Davis, C. Austin, Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq·2020·World Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104817

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results from RCTs are not always scalable to larger, aggregated levels because market responses and spillovers are largely absent at the small scale of the experiments.

    “the results from RCTs are not always scalable to larger, aggregated levels because market responses and spillovers are largely absent at the small scale of the experiments ( 44 , 45 ).”

    From Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, C. A., & Mobarak, A. M.
Affiliations
  • American University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
127
Pages
104817
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995154761
Cited by
13
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
scaling up interventions, randomized controlled trials, anti-poverty policy, poverty measurement, treatment effect heterogeneity, spillover effects, general equilibrium effects, implementation barriers, policy evaluation, development research, research-policy relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review