Upcycling and catalytic degradation of plastic wastes
Open accessAbstract
Various recycling technologies have been developed to deal with plastic problems, but they face considerable economic and technological challenges in practice. An attractive alternative is upcycling, which aims to dig out the embedded value to incentivize large-scale valorization of plastic wastes. The degradation of nonrecoverable plastic wastes is another necessity to treat the omnipresent pollution. This review presents an overview on the conversion of plastic wastes toward value-added products and the catalytic degradation of nonrecoverable plastic wastes. Based on an examination of traditional recycling technologies and products, we summarize the state-of-the-art design and development of plastic conversion to high-value and high-performance fuels, chemicals, and materials. Subsequently, we highlight the advances in catalytic degradation of plastics to environmentally benign or degradable products and mineralization into carbon dioxide and water. We conclude with our perspective on the ongoing challenge and opportunities.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By changing the conditions during the carbonization process, carbon products with different structures and properties can be obtained, such as activated carbon, carbon fibers, carbon spheres, carbon nanotubes, and graphene.
“By changing the conditions during the carbonization process, carbon products with different structures and properties can be obtained, such as activated carbon, carbon fibers, carbon spheres, carbon nanotubes, and graphene (Hou et al. 2021;Hussin et al. 2021;Kumari et al. 2022).”
From Conversion of waste plastics into value-added carbon materials (2023) · cites this paper as Hou et al. 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 190 · Cited by 335
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
- Authors
- Hou, Q., Zhen, M., Qian, H., Nie, Y., Bai, X., Xia, T., Laiq Ur Rehman, M., Li, Q., & Ju, M.
- Affiliations
- Nankai University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ju, Meiting
- Venue
- Cell Reports Physical Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 100514
- ISSN
- 2666-3864 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3186024751
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 190
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 16.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports Physical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by Tianjin (TJSQNTJ-2018-06)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21878163, 51708301)
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M640231)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
- Keywords
- plastic waste upcycling, plastic recycling, plastic pollution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review