Cited by 29Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDermatology and Skin DiseasesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Expanding personalized, data-driven dermatology: leveraging digital health technology and machine learning to improve patient outcomes

Open access
Wongvibulsin, Shannon, Frech, Tracy M., Chren, Mary-Margaret, Tkaczyk, Eric R.·2022·JID Innovations

Abstract

The current revolution of digital health technology and machine learning offers enormous potential to improve patient care. Nevertheless, it is essential to recognize that dermatology requires an approach different from those of other specialties. For many dermatological conditions, there is a lack of standardized methodology for quantitatively tracking disease progression and treatment response (clinimetrics). Furthermore, dermatological diseases impact patients in complex ways, some of which can be measured only through patient reports (psychometrics). New tools using digital health technology (e.g., smartphone applications, wearable devices) can aid in capturing both clinimetric and psychometric variables over time. With these data, machine learning can inform efforts to improve health care by, for example, the identification of high-risk patient groups, optimization of treatment strategies, and prediction of disease outcomes. We use the term personalized, data-driven dermatology to refer to the use of comprehensive data to inform individual patient care and improve patient outcomes. In this paper, we provide a framework that includes data from multiple sources, leverages digital health technology, and uses machine learning. Although this framework is applicable broadly to dermatological conditions, we use the example of a serious inflammatory skin condition, chronic cutaneous graft-versus-host disease, to illustrate personalized, data-driven dermatology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xjidi.2022.100105

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI tools can be utilized to match patients with optimal therapies on the basis of individual disease pathways and subphenotypes.

    “By moving beyond images and integrating data such as genetic profiles, transcriptomics, exposomics, clinical information, and patient outcomes, AI tools can be utilized to match patients with optimal therapies on the basis of individual disease pathways and subphenotypes (Patrick et al, 2018a; Wongvibulsin et al, 2022).”

    From Artificial intelligence–enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases (2026) · cites this paper as Wongvibulsin et al, 2022

    The Abstract and “Personalized, data-driven dermatology” section describe using machine learning and data from multiple sources to optimize treatment strategies and inform individual care. They do not specifically say that AI matches patients to optimal therapies on the basis of individual disease pathways or subphenotypes. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Olsen L.A. Aisner D. McGinnis J.M. The learning healthcare system 2007 National Academies Press Washington, DC 21452449

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wongvibulsin, S., Frech, T. M., Chren, M.-M., & Tkaczyk, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Tkaczyk, Eric R.
Venue
JID Innovations
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
100105
ISSN
2667-0267 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210698384
Cited by
29
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JID Innovations (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Clinical Science Research and Development
  • National Institutes of Health (F30HL142131, K23AR067889, R01AR073001, 5T32GM007309)
  • US Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
data-driven medicine, digital health technologies, machine learning, clinimetrics, psychometrics, chronic cutaneous graft-versus-host disease, inflammatory skin diseases, mobile application, wearable devices, disease progression monitoring, treatment response, high-risk patient identification, disease outcome prediction, multi-source data fusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review