Cited by 36CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPlant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies

CRISPR–Cas12a base editors confer efficient multiplexed genome editing in rice

Open access
Cheng, Yanhao, Zhang, Yingxiao, Li, Gen, Fang, Hong, Sretenovic, Simon, Fan, Avery, Li, Jiang, Xu, Jianping +2 more·2023·Plant Communications

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100601

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delivery of the enzymes expressed limitations of less efficiency, tissue-specificity, immunogenicity, and species-specificity.

    “The delivery of the enzymes expressed the limitations of less efficiency, tissue-specific, immunogenicity, and species-specificity, etc. (Chen et al., 2020; Cheng et al., 2023).”

    From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Cheng et al., 2023

    The main text (page unavailable) discusses editing efficiency at different rice target sites, not the efficiency of enzyme delivery. Searches for delivery limitations, tissue specificity, immunogenicity, and species specificity found no passage addressing those claims. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, G., Fang, H., Sretenovic, S., Fan, A., Li, J., Xu, J., Que, Q., & Qi, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Syngenta (United States) (US)
  • Syngenta (China) (CN)
  • Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research (US)
Corresponding author
Qi, Yiping
Venue
Plant Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
100601
ISSN
2590-3462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4365517431
Cited by
36
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Syngenta International
  • National Science Foundation (IOS-2029889, IOS-2132693)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • NSF
  • USDA NIFA (2021-67013-34554)
  • Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (593603)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas12a, base editors, multiplexed genome editing, rice, genome editing efficiency
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Oryza, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review