Cited by 59Hair Growth and DisordersDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulationdental development and anomalies

The Edar subfamily in feather placode formation.

Open access
Drew, Caroline F., Lin, Chih Min, Jiang, Ting Xin, Blunt, Geoff, Mou, Chunyan, Chuong, Cheng Ming, Headon, Denis J.·2007·Developmental Biology

Abstract

A subgroup of the TNF receptor family, composed of Edar, Troy and Xedar, are implicated in the development of ectodermal appendages, such as hair follicles, teeth and sweat glands. We have isolated chicken orthologues of these three receptors and analysed their roles in early feather development. Conservation of protein sequences between mammalian and avian proteins is variable, with avian Edar showing the greatest degree of sequence identity. cXedar differs from its mammalian orthologue in that it contains an intracellular death domain. All three receptors are expressed during early feather morphogenesis and dominant negative forms of each receptor impair the epithelial contribution to feather bud morphogenesis, while the dermal contribution appears unaffected. Hyperactivation of each receptor leads to more widespread assumption of placode fate, though in different regions of the skin. Receptor signaling converges on NF-kappaB, and inhibiting this transcription factor alters feather bud number and size in a stage-specific manner. Our findings illustrate the roles of these three receptors during avian skin morphogenesis and also suggest that activators of feather placode fate undergo mutual regulation to reach a decision on skin appendage location and size.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.02.011

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eda signaling is necessary for the development and patterning of epithelial placodes of many integumentary organs in both mouse and chick.

    “Eda signaling is necessary for the development and patterning of epithelial placodes of many integumentary organs in both the mouse and chick [19]–[22].”

    From Zebrafish eda and edar Mutants Reveal Conserved and Ancestral Roles of Ectodysplasin Signaling in Vertebrates (2008) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction says the Eda pathway is required to initiate primary hair follicles in mice, and the Discussion reports that suppressing related signaling in chick skin impairs feather placode formation and changes bud density. But the Discussion also says receptor activity is not required for the initial assumption of placodal fate. The paper does not establish necessity for the placodes of many organ types in both species; these passages have no page number in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Expression of Eda and Edar is found predominantly in basal epidermal cells, but in feathers Eda is detected in the subjacent mesenchyme as well.

    “Expression of Eda and Edar is found predominantly in the basal epidermal cells, but in the case of feathers Eda is detected in the subjacent mesenchyme as well [21],[22].”

    From Zebrafish eda and edar Mutants Reveal Conserved and Ancestral Roles of Ectodysplasin Signaling in Vertebrates (2008) · cites this paper as [22]

    In “Cloning and expression of the chicken Edar subfamily” (page unavailable), cEdar is detected specifically in the epidermis. “Eda splice variants and protein solubilization” (page unavailable) detects Eda in both epidermis and dermis, supporting the feather-specific dermal component. The paper does not locate either gene specifically in basal epidermal cells; it reports higher Eda transcript levels in the dermis than in the epidermis at E7 and E10, contrary to the claim that Eda is predominantly epidermal. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mou, C., Jackson, B., Schneider, P., Overbeek, P.A., Headon, D.J., 2006. Generation of the primary hair follicle pattern. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 9075-9080.
  2. Srivastava, A.K., Pispa, J., Hartung, A.J., Du, Y., Ezer, S., Jenks, T., Shimada, T., Pekkanen, M., Mikkola, M.L., Ko, M.S., Thesleff, I., Kere, J., Schlessinger, D., 1997. The Tabby phenotype is caused by mutation in a mouse homologue of the EDA gene that reveals novel mouse and human exons and encodes a protein (ectodysplasin-A) with collagenous domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13069-13074.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drew, C. F., Lin, C. M., Jiang, T. X., Blunt, G., Mou, C., Chuong, C. M., & Headon, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Headon, Denis J.
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
305
Issue
1
Pages
232-245
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151527805
Cited by
59
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/B/12083)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR 042177, R01AR042177, AR047364, R01AR047364)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
Keywords
EDAR, Troy, TNF receptor superfamily, chickens, NF-κB signaling, death domain, dominant negative receptor
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Chickens, Feathers, Molecular Sequence Data, Morphogenesis, Oligonucleotides, Species Specificity, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, NF-kappa B, Conserved Sequence, In Situ Hybridization, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Edar-Associated Death Domain Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review