Cited by 38Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Neuroblast lineage identification and lineage-specific Hox gene action during postembryonic development of the subesophageal ganglion in the Drosophila central brain

Open access
Kuert, Philipp A., Hartenstein, Volker, Bello, Bruno C., Lovick, Jennifer K., Reichert, Heinrich·2014·Developmental Biology

Abstract

The central brain of Drosophila consists of the supraesophageal ganglion (SPG) and the subesophageal ganglion (SEG), both of which are generated by neural stem cell-like neuroblasts during embryonic and postembryonic development. Considerable information has been obtained on postembryonic development of the neuroblasts and their lineages in the SPG. In contrast, very little is known about neuroblasts, neural lineages, or any other aspect of the postembryonic development in the SEG. Here we characterize the neuroanatomy of the larval SEG in terms of tracts, commissures, and other landmark features as compared to a thoracic ganglion. We then use clonal MARCM labeling to identify all adult-specific neuroblast lineages in the late larval SEG and find a surprisingly small number of neuroblast lineages, 13 paired and one unpaired. The Hox genes Dfd, Scr, and Antp are expressed in a lineage-specific manner in these lineages during postembryonic development. Hox gene loss-of-function causes lineage-specific defects in axonal targeting and reduction in neural cell numbers. Moreover, it results in the formation of novel ectopic neuroblast lineages. Apoptosis block also results in ectopic lineages suggesting that Hox genes are required for lineage-specific termination of proliferation through programmed cell death. Taken together, our findings show that postembryonic development in the SEG is mediated by a surprisingly small set of identified lineages and requires lineage-specific Hox gene action to ensure the correct formation of adult-specific neurons in the Drosophila brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.03.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous literature expected a total of around 119 lineages in the central brain, including the gnathal ganglia (GNG).

    “From previous literature, we expected a total of around 119 lineages in the central brain, including the gnathal ganglia (GNG)31–34,84.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 38

Authors
Kuert, P. A., Hartenstein, V., Bello, B. C., Lovick, J. K., & Reichert, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Kuert, Philipp A.
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
390
Issue
2
Pages
102-115
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064546447
Cited by
38
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Swiss NSF and the Sinergia Program (CRSII3 136307)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
suboesophageal ganglion, neuroblast lineage, Hox genes, postembryonic development, DFD, SCR, axon targeting, programmed cell death, apoptosis, neural stem cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Drosophila, Genes, Homeobox, Immunohistochemistry, Ganglia, Invertebrate, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Microscopy, Confocal, Cell Lineage, Neural Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review