Cited by 173Cancer Cells and Metastasis3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Differences in growth properties of endometrial cancer in three dimensional (3D) culture and 2D cell monolayer

Chitcholtan, Kenny, Asselin, Eric, Parent, Sophie, Sykes, Peter H., Evans, John J.·2013·Experimental Cell Research

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models have an invaluable role in understanding the behaviour of tumour cells in a well defined microenvironment. This is because some aspects of tumour characteristics cannot be fully recapitulated in a cell monolayer (2D). In the present study, we compared growth patterns, expression of signalling molecules, and metabolism-associated proteins of endometrial cancer cell lines in 3D and 2D cell cultures. Cancer cells formed spherical structures in 3D reconstituted basement membrane (3D rBM), and the morphological appearance was cell line dependent. Cell differentiation was observed after 8 days in the 3D rBM. There was reduced proliferation, detected by less expression of PCNA in 3D rBM than in 2D cell monolayers. The addition of exogenous epidermal growth factor (EGF) to cancer cells induced phosphorylation of EGFR and Akt in both cell culture conditions. The uptake of glucose was selectively altered in the 3D rBM, but there was a lack of association with Glut-1 expression. The secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) was selectively altered in 3D rBM, and it was cell line dependent. Our data demonstrated that 3D rBM as an in vitro model can influence proliferation and metabolism of endometrial cancer cell behaviour compared to 2D cell monolayer. Changes are specific to individual cell types. The use of 3D rBM is, therefore, important in the in vitro study of targeted anticancer therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.09.012

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chitcholtan, K., Asselin, E., Parent, S., Sykes, P. H., & Evans, J. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
Corresponding author
Chitcholtan, Kenny
Venue
Experimental Cell Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
319
Issue
1
Pages
75-87
ISSN
0014-4827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078088491
Cited by
173
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
endometrial cancer, 3D cell culture, reconstituted basement membrane, tumor microenvironment, cell proliferation, PCNA, epidermal growth factor, EGFR phosphorylation, Akt phosphorylation, glucose uptake, GLUT1, vascular endothelial growth factor, prostaglandin E2, cell differentiation, cell line dependence
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Female, Humans, Signal Transduction, Endometrial Neoplasms, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Tumor Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review