Cited by 108DNA Repair MechanismsBRCA gene mutations in cancerPARP inhibition in cancer therapy

The role of BRCA1 in DNA double-strand repair: Past and present

Caestecker, Kevin W., Van de Walle, Gerlinde R.·2013·Experimental Cell Research

Abstract

The breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) is involved in several important cellular pathways, including DNA damage repair, chromatin remodeling and checkpoint activation. The BRCA1 tumor suppression function has been attributed to its role in homologous recombination damage repair. In this review, historical facts concerning BRCA1, together with recent research advances regarding our understanding of the BRCA1 interacting proteins that are involved in, homologous recombination (HR) double strand break (DBS) repair and how these interacting proteins maintain chromosomal integrity, are discussed. In addition, this review poses the questions as to what extent HR repair cannot be properly fulfilled when breast cancer related mutations in the BRCA1 gene occur and how the recent and excessive studied poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibiting therapy approach links with the proposed tumor suppression function of the different BRCA1 domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.11.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BRCA1-BARD1 complex acts in homologous recombination-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

    “The tumor suppressor complex BRCA1-BARD1 functions in DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination.”

    From BRCA1–BARD1 promotes RAD51-mediated homologous DNA pairing (2017) · cites this paper as [19]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 107 · Cited by 108

Authors
Caestecker, K. W., & Van de Walle, G. R.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Experimental Cell Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
319
Issue
5
Pages
575-587
ISSN
0014-4827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109361580
Cited by
108
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Gent
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Keywords
BRCA1, DNA double-strand break repair, homologous recombination, chromosome integrity, tumor suppression, breast cancer susceptibility, chromatin remodeling, DNA damage checkpoint, PARP inhibitors
MeSH terms
Animals, Breast Neoplasms, DNA Repair, Female, Humans, Mutation, BRCA1 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review