The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High resolution melting applications for clinical laboratory medicine
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-resolution DNA melting analysis: advancements and limitations
Wittwer, C. T. (2009) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20951 · Cited by 468
Self-citationEmerging Technologies for Molecular Diagnosis of Sepsis
Sinha, M., Jupe, J., Mack, H., Coleman, T. P., Lawrence, S. M., & Fraley, S. I. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00089-17 · Cited by 331
Point mutation frequency in the FMR1 gene as revealed by fragile X syndrome screening
Handt, M., Epplen, A., Hoffjan, S., Mese, K., Epplen, J. T., & Dekomien, G. (2014) · Molecular and Cellular Probes · doi:10.1016/j.mcp.2014.08.003 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Erali, M., Voelkerding, K. V., & Wittwer, C. T.
- Venue
- Experimental and Molecular Pathology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-58
- ISSN
- 0014-4800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066954795
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High resolution melting applications for clinical laboratory medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.03.012
- The paper
- Erali, M., Voelkerding, K. V., & Wittwer, C. T. (2008). High resolution melting applications for clinical laboratory medicine. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.03.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
