Cited by 71Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchReproductive tract infections researchEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

The association of pre-conization high-risk HPV load and the persistence of HPV infection and persistence/recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization

Park, Jeong-Yeol, Lee, Kyung Hee, Dong, Seung Myung, Kang, Sokbom, Park, Sang-Yoon, Seo, Sang-Soo·2008·Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the pre-conization high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) load is predictive for the persistence of HR-HPV infection and the persistence/recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after conization of the cervix. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed on 236 women who underwent conization due to CIN at the Center for Uterine Cancer, National Cancer Center, Korea, between March 2001 and March 2006. The samples for pre-conization HR-HPV test were obtained at least within 3 weeks before conization. All patients underwent HR-HPV testing and cytology between 3 and 6 months after conization, and subsequent follow-up of 3- to 6-month interval was performed thereafter. The persistence of HR-HPV infection and persistence/recurrence of histologic abnormality after conization were analyzed by age, parity, menopausal status, method of conization, glandular extension, margin status, severity of CIN, and pre-cone HR-HPV load in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results In univariate analysis, high pre-cone HR-HPV load was the only risk factor for the persistence of HR-HPV infection after conization (persistent HR-HPV infection; 19.8% [23/116] of patients with an HR-HPV load > or = 100 RLU/PC vs. 10.0% [12/120] of patients with a load or = 100 RLU/PC was a risk factor for persistence/recurrence of histological abnormalities after conization (P=0.040, OR=5.748, 95% CI=1.082-30.526). Conclusion Patien…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, J.-Y., Lee, K. H., Dong, S. M., Kang, S., Park, S.-Y., & Seo, S.-S.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Center (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Venue
Gynecologic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
549-554
ISSN
0090-8258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034950824
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynecologic Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
human papillomavirus, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, conization, persistent HPV infection, risk factors, liquid-based cytology
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Korea, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Conization, Viral Load, Papillomaviridae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review