Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 661

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating T cells in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis

Open access
Hwang, Wei-Ting, Adams, Sarah F., Tahirovic, Emin, Hagemann, Ian S., Coukos, George·2012·Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

Objective The presence of T cells within the epithelial component of tumors, as histologic evidence of anti-tumor immunity, has been associated with a survival advantage in multiple studies across diverse patient cohorts. We performed a meta-analysis of studies evaluating the prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) on survival among women with ovarian cancer and to investigate factors associated with variations in this effect, including patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, tumor histology, and study protocols. Method Published studies that evaluated the association between TIL and patient survival were identified. Descriptive statistics, outcome data, and study quality were extracted from studies that met inclusion criteria. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were pooled across studies using the random-effects model. Publication bias was investigated using a funnel plot and heterogeneity was assessed with subgroup analysis and I2 statistics. Results Ten suitable studies comprising 1,815 patients with ovarian cancer were analyzed. Our results demonstrate that a lack of intraepithelial TILs is significantly associated with a worse survival among patients (pooled HR: 2.24, 95% CI; 1.71–2.91). Variations in the prognostic value of TIL status based on debulking status, scoring method, and geographic regions were identified. Conclusions Intraepithelial TILs are a robust predictor of outcome in ovarian cancer and define a specific class of patients, whose distinct tumor biology should be taken into account in devising appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.039

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 661

Metadata

Authors
Hwang, W.-T., Adams, S. F., Tahirovic, E., Hagemann, I. S., & Coukos, G.
Venue
Gynecologic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
192-198
ISSN
0090-8258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027726380
Cited by
661
References
6
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating T cells in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.039
The paper
Hwang, W.-T., Adams, S. F., Tahirovic, E., Hagemann, I. S., & Coukos, G. (2012). Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating T cells in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. Gynecologic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.039

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.