Cited by 40Attachment and Relationship DynamicsNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Endogenous estradiol levels are associated with attachment avoidance and implicit intimacy motivation.

Edelstein, Robin S., Stanton, Steven J., Henderson, Melanie M., Sanders, Melissa R.·2010·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Estradiol has been linked with attachment and caregiving processes in humans and other mammals; however, relations between estradiol and personality constructs relevant to intimate relationships have not yet been explored. In the present sample of 100 adult participants (52 men, 48 women), we examined endogenous estradiol levels in relation to two personality constructs that predict comfort with and desire for close, intimate relationships-attachment style and implicit intimacy motivation. In both men and women, estradiol levels were predicted by an interaction between a dimension of attachment style-attachment avoidance-and implicit intimacy motivation. Specifically, the highest estradiol levels were observed among participants whose explicit traits support the expression of their implicit motives, that is, those characterized by both low avoidance and high intimacy motivation. Our findings provide novel evidence that endogenous estradiol levels are associated with relationship-relevant personality constructs in theoretically meaningful ways. These findings also highlight the importance of considering interactions between implicit and explicit personality constructs in the study of the biological bases of personality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.11.007

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edelstein, R. S., Stanton, S. J., Henderson, M. M., & Sanders, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Edelstein, Robin S.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
230-236
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166731149
Cited by
40
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
estradiol, attachment avoidance, attachment styles, implicit motives, intimate relationships, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Estradiol, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Motivation, Psychological Tests, Saliva

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review