Salubrious effects of oxytocin on social stress-induced deficits
Open accessAbstract
Social relationships are a fundamental aspect of life, affecting social, psychological, physiological, and behavioral functions. While positive social interactions can attenuate stress and promote health, the social environment can also be a major source of stress when it includes social disruption, confrontation, isolation, or neglect. Social stress can impair the basal function and stress-induced activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, impairing function of multiple biological systems and posing a risk to mental and physical health. In contrast, social support can ameliorate stress-induced physiological and immunological deficits, reducing the risk of subsequent psychological distress and improving an individual's overall well-being. For better clinical treatment of these physiological and mental pathologies, it is necessary to understand the regulatory mechanisms of stress-induced pathologies as well as determine the underlying biological mechanisms that regulate social buffering of the stress system. A number of ethologically relevant animal models of social stress and species that form strong adult social bonds have been utilized to study the etiology, treatment, and prevention of stress-related disorders. While undoubtedly a number of biological pathways contribute to the social buffering of the stress response, the convergence of evidence denotes the regulatory effects of oxytocin in facilitating social bond-promoting behaviors and their effect on the stress response. Thus, oxytocin may be perceived as a common regulatory element of the social environment, stress response, and stress-induced risks on mental and physical health. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Social Behavior.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social bonding may buffer stress's biological brain effects by lessening negative stress appraisal, encouraging active coping, and reducing HPA stress responses.
“Research provides evidence that social bonding can moderate these biological effects of stress on the brain by reducing negative appraisal of stressors, promoting active and effective coping, and downregulating the HPA response to stress.16,48–51”
From Why the cognitive ‘fountain of youth’ may be upstream: pathways to dementia risk and resilience through social connectedness (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
OT is a well-known anxiolytic agent.
“since OT is a well-known anxiolytic agent (Smith and Wang, 2012)”
From Oxytocin facilitates fidelity in well-established marmoset pairs by reducing sociosexual behavior toward opposite-sex strangers (2014) · cites this paper as Smith and Wang, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 229 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Smith, A. S., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Adam S.
- Venue
- Hormones and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-330
- ISSN
- 0018-506X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3350103
- OpenAlex
- W2080133965
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 229
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (MHR21-83128, DAK02-23048, DAR01-19627, MHF31-095464, MHR01-58616)
- National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH095464, R01MH058616, R01MH089852)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K02DA023048, R01DA019627)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- oxytocin, social stress, social buffering, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, social support, social bonds, stress response, social isolation, stress-related disorders
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Health Status, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Immune System, Immunity, Mental Health, Object Attachment, Oxytocin, Paraventricular Hypothalamic Nucleus, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review