Cited by 139Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Evolving nonapeptide mechanisms of gregariousness and social diversity in birds

Open access
Goodson, James L., Kelly, Aubrey M., Kingsbury, Marcy A.·2012·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Of the major vertebrate taxa, Class Aves is the most extensively studied in relation to the evolution of social systems and behavior, largely because birds exhibit an incomparable balance of tractability, diversity, and cognitive complexity. In addition, like humans, most bird species are socially monogamous, exhibit biparental care, and conduct most of their social interactions through auditory and visual modalities. These qualities make birds attractive as research subjects, and also make them valuable for comparative studies of neuroendocrine mechanisms. This value has become increasingly apparent as more and more evidence shows that social behavior circuits of the basal forebrain and midbrain are deeply conserved (from an evolutionary perspective), and particularly similar in birds and mammals. Among the strongest similarities are the basic structures and functions of avian and mammalian nonapeptide systems, which include mesotocin (MT) and arginine vasotocin (VT) systems in birds, and the homologous oxytocin (OT) and vasopressin (VP) systems, respectively, in mammals. We here summarize these basic properties, and then describe a research program that has leveraged the social diversity of estrildid finches to gain insights into the nonapeptide mechanisms of grouping, a behavioral dimension that is not experimentally tractable in most other taxa. These studies have used five monogamous, biparental finch species that exhibit group sizes ranging from territorial male-female pairs to large flocks containing hundreds or thousands of birds. The results provide novel insights into the history of nonapeptide functions in amniote vertebrates, and yield remarkable clarity on the nonapeptide biology of dinosaurs and ancient mammals. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Social Behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxytocin receptor signaling influences several social behaviors in animals, including maternal care and bonding, social reward and gregariousness, social recognition, and pair bonding in monogamous species.

    “OXTR affects a range of social behaviors in animals including maternal nurturing and bonding (1, 2), social reward and gregariousness (3, 4), social recognition (5), and pair bonding in monogamous species (6–8).”
  • OXTR is often enriched in regions of crucial behavioral circuits such as the mesolimbic reward network and social decision-making network, and appears to modulate these networks to generate species-specific social strategies such as monogamous social attachments and social gregarity.

    “OXTR is often enriched within regions of crucial behavioral circuits such as the mesolimbic reward (MLR) network and social decision making network and appears to modulate these networks to generate species-specific social strategies such as monogamous social attachments (32) and social gregarity (7).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 138 · Cited by 139

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Clements JF 2007 Birds of the world: a checklist 6 Pica Press Sussex

Authors
Goodson, J. L., Kelly, A. M., & Kingsbury, M. A.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Goodson, James L.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
239-250
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130363264
Cited by
139
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062656)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
nonapeptide, mesotocin, arginine vasotocin, oxytocin, vasopressin, social behavior, gregariousness, estrildid finches, social monogamy, biparental care, evolution of social behavior, group size, dinosaurs, neuroendocrine mechanisms
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Female, Male, Maternal Behavior, Nerve Fibers, Object Attachment, Oligopeptides, Oxytocin, Phenotype, Septal Nuclei, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Social Behavior, Vasotocin, Vertebrates, Receptors, Neuropeptide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review