Cited by 13Sexual Differentiation and DisordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesEstrogen and related hormone effects

Potential contribution of progesterone receptors to the development of sexual behavior in male and female mice

Open access
Desroziers, Elodie, Brock, Olivier, Bakker, Julie·2017·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

We previously showed that estradiol can have both defeminizing and feminizing effects on the developing mouse brain. Pre- and early postnatal estradiol defeminized the ability to show lordosis in adulthood, whereas prepubertal estradiol feminized this ability. Furthermore, we found that estradiol upregulates progesterone receptors (PR) during development, inducing both a male-and female-typical pattern of PR expression in the mouse hypothalamus. In the present study, we took advantage of a newly developed PR antagonist (ZK 137316) to determine whether PR contributes to either male- or female-typical sexual differentiation. Thus groups of male and female C57Bl/6j mice were treated with ZK 137316 or OIL as control: males were treated neonatally (P0-P10), during the critical period for male sexual differentiation, and females were treated prepubertally (P15-P25), during the critical period for female sexual differentiation. In adulthood, mice were tested for sexual behavior. In males, some minor effects of neonatal ZK treatment on sexual behavior were observed: latencies to the first mount, intromission and ejaculation were decreased in neonatally ZK treated males; however, this effect disappeared by the second mating test. By contrast, female mice treated with ZK during the prepubertal period showed significantly less lordosis than OIL-treated females. Mate preferences were not affected in either males or females treated with ZK during development. Taken together, these results suggest a role for PR and thus perhaps progesterone in the development of lordosis behavior in female mice. By contrast, no obvious role for PR can be discerned in the development of male sexual behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.05.008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another study using ZK 137616 found no effect on male mouse sex behavior.

    “another study using a different PR antagonist, ZK 137616, found no effect on male mouse sex behavior [11].”

    From Sex-specific effects of neonatal progestin receptor antagonism on juvenile social play behavior in rats (2021) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Methods section identifies the antagonist as ZK137316, not ZK 137616. The male sexual behavior Results report no difference in the numbers of mounts, intromissions, or ejaculations, but significantly shorter latencies for all three in the first mating test; therefore, 'no effect' overstates the finding. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Döhler, K.D., Hancke, J.L., Srivastava, SS, Hofmann, C., Shryne, J.E., Gorski, R.A., 1984. Participation of estrogens in female sexual differentiation of the brain: neuroanatomical, neuroendocrine, and behavioral evidence. In de Vries, G.J., de Bruin, J.P.C., Uylings, H.B.M., Corner, M.A., (Eds), Progress in brain research, Vol 61, Sex differences in the brain. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 99-117.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desroziers, E., Brock, O., & Bakker, J.
Affiliations
University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Bakker, Julie
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
90
Pages
31-38
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346481449
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Université de Liège
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (3.4571.10)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
progesterone receptor, sexual differentiation of the brain, lordosis behavior, antiprogestins, estradiol, neonatal treatment, male sexual behavior, female sexual behavior, hypothalamus, mating behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Estradiol, Female, Feminization, Hormone Antagonists, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pregnancy, Progesterone, Receptors, Progesterone, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Differentiation, Steroids, Receptors, Neuropeptide Y, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review