Cited by 50Spatial Cognition and NavigationReproductive Health and ContraceptionSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Does the use of hormonal contraceptives affect the mental rotation performance?

Griksiene, Ramune, Monciunskaite, Rasa, Arnatkeviciute, Aurina, Ruksenas, Osvaldas·2018·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Oral contraceptive pill (OC) is one of the most popular form of contraception. Despite both behavioral and neuroimaging evidence of its significant impact on female brain and cognitive functions, much remains to be discovered regarding OCs targets in the brain and mechanisms of action. In the present study mental rotation performance was compared between women using anti-androgenic oral contraceptives (n = 35), naturally cycling (NC) women (n = 33) and men (n = 29). On average, OC users were less accurate than NC women and men. Men performed the task more accurately than NC women, but the difference reached significance only in the highest angular disparity condition (150 deg). The response time was positively related with progesterone level while accuracy was negatively related with 17ß-estradiol level, in NC, but not OC women. The comparison of slope and intercept values (parameters relating response time to angular disparity) revealed the main result of present study: OC users exhibited significantly lower slope compared to men and NC women, but there were no differences in intercept between groups. These results suggest that OC users instead of using rotation in mind strategy implemented some alternative method(s). We conclude that lower performance accuracy of OC users could be related to a less efficient performance strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.03.004

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griksiene, R., Monciunskaite, R., Arnatkeviciute, A., & Ruksenas, O.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
100
Pages
29-38
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793117963
Cited by
50
References
85
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
oral contraceptives, mental rotation, spatial cognition, sex differences, progesterone, estradiol, reaction time (psychology), angular disparity, cognitive strategies, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cognition, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Estradiol, Female, Humans, Male, Menstrual Cycle, Progesterone, Rotation, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, Spatial Processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review