Cited by 20Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Differential effects of progesterone on social recognition and the avoidance of pathogen threat by female mice

Kavaliers, Martin, Bishnoi, Indra R., Ossenkopp, Klaus-Peter, Choleris, Elena·2021·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Although pathogen threat affects social and sexual responses across species, relatively little is known about the underlying neuroendocrine mechanisms. Progesterone has been speculated to be involved in the mediation of pathogen disgust in women, though with mixed experimental support. Here we considered the effects of acute progesterone on the disgust-like avoidance responses of female mice to pathogen threat. Estrous female mice discriminated and avoided the urinary and associated odors of males subclinically infected with the murine nematode parasite, Heligmosomoides polygyrus. These avoidance responses were not significantly affected by pre-treatment with progesterone. Likewise, brief (1 min) exposure to the odors of infected males attenuated the subsequent responses of females to the odors of the normally preferred unfamiliar males and enhanced their preferences for familiar males. Neither progesterone nor allopregnanolone, a central neurosteroid metabolite of progesterone, had any significant effects on the avoidance of unfamiliar males elicited by pre-exposure to a parasitized male. Progesterone and allopregnanolone, did, however, significantly attenuate the typical preferences of estrous females for unfamiliar uninfected males, suggestive of effects on social recognition. These findings with mice indicate that progesterone may have minimal effects on the responses to specific parasite threat and the expression of pathogen disgust but may influence more general social…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104873

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavaliers, M., Bishnoi, I. R., Ossenkopp, K.-P., & Choleris, E.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Kavaliers, Martin
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
127
Pages
104873
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093157161
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
progesterone, allopregnanolone, social recognition, pathogen disgust, Heligmosomoides polygyrus, parasite avoidance, urinary odor, social preferences, neurosteroids, pathogen threat
MeSH terms
Disgust, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Estrus, Female, Male, Nematospiroides dubius, Odorants, Progesterone, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Strongylida Infections, Animals, Outbred Strains, Recognition, Psychology, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review