Cited by 37Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Vasopressin infusion into the lateral septum of adult male rats rescues progesterone-induced impairment in social recognition

Open access
Bychowski, M.E., Mena, J.D., Auger, C.J.·2013·Neuroscience

Abstract

It is well established that social recognition memory is mediated, in part, by arginine vasopressin (AVP). AVP cells within the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST) and medial amygdala (MeA) send AVP-ergic projections to the lateral septum (LS). We have demonstrated that progesterone treatment decreases AVP immunoreactivity within the BST, the MeA and the LS, and that progesterone treatment impairs social recognition. These data suggested that progesterone may impair social recognition memory by decreasing AVP. In the present experiment, we hypothesized that infusions of AVP into the LS would rescue the progesterone-induced impairment in social recognition within adult male rats. One week after adult male rats underwent cannula surgery, they were given systemic injections of either a physiological dose of progesterone or oil control for 3 days. Four hours after the last injection, we tested social recognition memory using the social discrimination paradigm, a two-trial test that is based on the natural propensity for rats to be highly motivated to investigate novel conspecifics. Immediately after the first exposure to a juvenile, each animal received bilateral infusions of either AVP or artificial cerebrospinal fluid into the LS. Our results show that, as expected, control animals exhibited normal social discrimination. In corroboration with our previous results, animals given progesterone have impaired social discrimination. Interestingly, animals treated with progesterone and AVP exhibited normal social discrimination, suggesting that AVP treatment rescued the impairment in social recognition caused by progesterone. These data also further support a role for progesterone in modulating vasopressin-dependent behavior within the male brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.047

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present study is the first to show effects on juvenile social play behavior following a transient neonatal manipulation of PRs.

    “Although previous data have demonstrated that PRs regulate social behavior in adults [17, 25], the present study is the first to show effects on juvenile social play behavior following a transient neonatal manipulation of PRs.”

    From Sex-specific effects of neonatal progestin receptor antagonism on juvenile social play behavior in rats (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction and Discussion (pages unavailable) report that progesterone treatment impairs social recognition in adult male rats, supporting the cited sentence’s point about adult social behavior. The paper notes that relevant vasopressin cells contain progestin receptors, but it does not establish that the receptors themselves regulate that behavior. The claim about neonatal manipulation and juvenile play describes the citing authors’ present study, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bychowski, M. E., Mena, J. D., & Auger, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
246
Pages
52-58
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058960403
Cited by
37
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health, National Research Service Award (T32 Gm007507)
  • National Science Foundation (IOS-1122074)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
vasopressin, progesterone, social recognition memory, social discrimination, lateral septum, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial amygdala, male rats
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Male, Progesterone, Septal Nuclei, Social Behavior, Vasopressins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Recognition, Psychology, Rats, Infusions, Intraventricular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review