Revisiting metabolic engineering strategies for microbial synthesis of oleochemicals
Open accessAbstract
Microbial production of oleochemicals from renewable feedstocks remains an attractive route to produce high-energy density, liquid transportation fuels and high-value chemical products. Metabolic engineering strategies have been applied to demonstrate production of a wide range of oleochemicals, including free fatty acids, fatty alcohols, esters, olefins, alkanes, ketones, and polyesters in both bacteria and yeast. The majority of these demonstrations synthesized products containing long-chain fatty acids. These successes motivated additional effort to produce analogous molecules comprised of medium-chain fatty acids, molecules that are less common in natural oils and therefore of higher commercial value. Substantial progress has been made towards producing a subset of these chemicals, but significant work remains for most. The other primary challenge to producing oleochemicals in microbes is improving the performance, in terms of yield, rate, and titer, of biocatalysts such that economic large-scale processes are feasible. Common metabolic engineering strategies include blocking pathways that compete with synthesis of oleochemical building blocks and/or consume products, pulling flux through pathways by removing regulatory signals, pushing flux into biosynthesis by overexpressing rate-limiting enzymes, and engineering cells to tolerate the presence of oleochemical products. In this review, we describe the basic fundamentals of oleochemical synthesis and summarize advances since 2013 towards improving performance of heterotrophic microbial cell factories.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The major hurdle faced by microalgae cultivation is limited biomass concentration in mature culture, around 3 g/L compared to 30-100 g/L for heterotrophic bacteria.
“The major hurdle faced by the microalgae cultivation process is the limited bio-mass concentration in the mature culture limited to around 3 g · L -1 compared to 30-100 g · L -1 biomass concentration of heterotrophic bacteria [134].”
From Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production (2021) · cites this paper as [134]
The Introduction discusses biomass flux as a challenge for oleochemical production, not biomass concentration in mature microalgae cultures. Searches for microalgae cultivation and the claimed 3 g/L versus 30–100 g/L comparison found no passage in our copy addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 158 · Cited by 105
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Davis, M.S., Solbiati, J., Cronan, J.E., 2000. Overproduction of acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity increases the rate of fatty acid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28593-8. doi:10.1074/jbc.M004756200 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, G., Xiong, X., Ghogare, R., Wang, P., Meng, Y., Chen, S., 2016. Exploring fatty alcoholproducing capability of Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Biofuels 9. doi:10.1186/s13068016-0512-3 · DOI
- Authors
- Yan, Q., & Pfleger, B. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pfleger, Brian F.
- Venue
- Metabolic Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 35-46
- ISSN
- 1096-7176 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2942090706
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 158
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Metabolic Engineering (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Biochemical and biochemical processes
- Keywords
- oleochemicals, microbial metabolic engineering, medium-chain fatty acids, free fatty acids, fatty alcohols, esters, alkenes, alkanes, ketones, polyesters, renewable raw materials, biofuels, yeast, bacteria
- MeSH terms
- Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Yarrowia, Biofuels, Metabolic Engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review