Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CRISPR/Cas9 directed editing of lycopene epsilon-cyclase modulates metabolic flux for β-carotene biosynthesis in banana fruit

Kaur, Navneet, Alok, Anshu, Shivani, Kumar, Pankaj, Kaur, Navjot, Awasthi, Praveen, Chaturvedi, Siddhant, Pandey, Pankaj, Pandey, Ashutosh, Pandey, Ajay K., Tiwari, Siddharth·2020·Metabolic Engineering

Abstract

Banana is one of the most economically important fruit crops worldwide. Genetic improvement in banana is a challenging task due to its parthenocarpic nature and triploid genome. Genetic modification of crops via the CRISPR/Cas9 module has emerged as a promising tool to develop important traits. In the present work, a CRISPR/Cas9-based approach was used to develop the β-carotene-enriched Cavendish banana cultivar (cv.) Grand Naine (AAA genome). The fifth exon of the lycopene epsilon-cyclase (LCYε) gene was targeted. The targeting specificity of the designed guide-RNA was also tested by its ability to create indels in the LCYε gene at the A genome of cv. Rasthali (AAB genome). Sequence analysis revealed multiple types of indels in the genomic region of Grand Naine LCYε (GN-LCYε). Metabolic profiling of the fruit pulp of selected edited lines showed enhanced accumulation of β-carotene content up to 6-fold (∼24 μg/g) compared with the unedited plants. These lines also showed either an absence or a drastic reduction in the levels of lutein and α-carotene, suggesting metabolic reprogramming, without any significant effect on the agro-morphological parameters. In addition, differential expression of carotenoid pathway genes was observed in the edited lines in comparison to unedited plants. Overall, this is the first report in banana to improve nutritional trait by using a precise genome editing approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.01.008

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Kaur, N., Alok, A., Shivani, Kumar, P., Kaur, N., Awasthi, P., Chaturvedi, S., Pandey, P., Pandey, A., Pandey, A. K., & Tiwari, S.
Venue
Metabolic Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
59
Pages
76-86
ISSN
1096-7176 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003750048
Cited by
258
References
54
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CRISPR/Cas9 directed editing of lycopene epsilon-cyclase modulates metabolic flux for β-carotene biosynthesis in banana fruit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymben.2020.01.008
The paper
Kaur, N., Alok, A., Shivani, Kumar, P., Kaur, N., Awasthi, P., Chaturvedi, S., Pandey, P., Pandey, A., Pandey, A. K., & Tiwari, S. (2020). CRISPR/Cas9 directed editing of lycopene epsilon-cyclase modulates metabolic flux for β-carotene biosynthesis in banana fruit. Metabolic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2020.01.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.