Cited by 299Virus-based gene therapy researchEthics in Clinical ResearchBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Lessons learned from the gene therapy trial for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency

Open access
Wilson, James M.·2009·Molecular Genetics and Metabolism

Abstract

It has been 9 years since Mr. Jesse Gelsinger died from complications of vector administration in a liver gene therapy trial of research subjects with a deficiency of ornithine transcarbamylase (OTCD). This study was performed at the Institute for Human Gene Therapy of the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) which I directed. His tragic death provoked a series of events that had implications beyond those directly involved in the clinical trial. The events surrounding the death of this research subject have been the topic of much coverage and commentary in the popular press. The goal of this article is to share with you my reflections on the OTCD gene therapy trial and lessons that I have learned which may be of value to others engaged in various aspects of translational medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.12.016

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adenoviral vectors have broader tropism, can be grown as high-titer recombinant viruses present in an episomal state, and can transduce dividing and non-dividing cells.

    “Ads are an attractive delivery system because of their broader tropism, grown as high-titer recombinant viruses present in an episomal state, and their ability to transduce dividing and non-dividing cells [55].”

    From The Ocular Gene Delivery Landscape (2021) · cites this paper as [55]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, James M.
Venue
Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
151-157
ISSN
1096-7192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107496779
Cited by
299
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Genetics and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, gene therapy, Jesse Gelsinger, clinical trial safety, translational medicine, lessons learned, research ethics
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Genetic Therapy, Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic, Ornithine Carbamoyltransferase Deficiency Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review